Hybrid what? Partial consensus and persistent divergences in the analysis of hybrid regimes
Hybrid what? Partial consensus and persistent divergences in the analysis of hybrid regimes
复制标题
混合动力什么？
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2014
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
A. Cassani
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Cassani
尽管最初对它们的存在持怀疑态度，但混合政体已日益引起学术界的关注。然而，辩论的迅速发展与其往往不确定的结果形成鲜明对比。本文的目的是找出造成这种僵局的原因，并寻求解决办法。本文特别关注一个关键的争论点：如何定义混合制度。分析显示了为什么在这个问题上的分歧阻碍了研究人员之间的对话，也阻碍了知识的积累。我们建议将注意力从制度转移到制度，并提出一个“共识敏感”指标，以确定哪些制度可以被定义为混合型，而不管对其概念化的分歧。新的测量方法被用来重复最近两项研究的对比结果。结论是，通过超越概念障碍，我们可以成功地阐明“灰色地带”。
Despite initial scepticism about their very existence, hybrid regimes have increasingly attracted scholarly attention. The rapid development of the debate, however, is in striking contrast with its often inconclusive results. The goals of this article are to identify the causes of this impasse and to seek a solution for it. In particular, the article focuses on a crucial point of contention: how to define hybrid regimes. The analysis shows why divergences on this issue hamper dialogue among researchers, as well as the accumulation of knowledge. We suggest shifting attention from regimes to institutions and propose a “consensus-sensitive” indicator to establish which regimes can be defined as hybrid regardless of disagreement on their conceptualisation. The new measure is used to replicate the contrasting results of two recent studies. The conclusion is that by going beyond conceptual barriers, we can successfully shed light on the “grey zone”.
发展中国家的政权混合性：转型新研究的成就和局限性
影响因子：
3.3
作者：
Zinecker
通讯作者：
Zinecker