Role of Postoperative Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Carcinoma: A meta-analysis of 2165 Patients.

Role of Postoperative Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Carcinoma: A meta-analysis of 2165 Patients.
复制标题

食管癌术后同步放化疗的作用:2165 名患者的荟萃分析

DOI:
10.7150/jca.20940
复制
发表时间:
2018
期刊:
影响因子:
3.9
通讯作者:
Hui Z
Hui Z
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Kang J;Chang JY;Sun X;Men Y;Zeng H;Hui Z

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

目的:本Meta分析旨在评价食道癌术后同期放化疗(后CCRT)的作用。方法:系统检索PubMed、PMC、EMBASE、Cochrane临床对照试验注册中心、中国国家知识基础设施和万方数据库。比较CCRT和非CCRT治疗食道癌术后患者的研究符合条件。感兴趣的结果是总生存期(OS)、局部区域复发率、远处转移率和不良事件发生率的优势比(OR)。结果:这项荟萃分析纳入了13项研究,2165名患者。CCRT后食道癌患者的OS显著改善。CCRT组与非CCRT组比较,1年、3年和5年OS的OR和95%可信区间分别为1.66[1.30~2.11]、1.50[1.24~1.81]和1.54[1.22~1.94]。放疗组局部复发率明显低于非放疗组(OR=0.58,95%CI=0.46~0.72),远处转移率与非放疗组比较差异无统计学意义(OR=0.94,95%CI=0.68~1.30)。CCRT术后未增加肺炎、吻合口狭窄或严重血液学毒性的风险。CCRT组轻度食管炎加重,但耐受性良好。结论:这项基于最大规模已发表文献的荟萃分析证实,对于食道癌患者,后CCRT可产生显著的生存益处,并改善局部区域控制,且毒性可耐受。
Purpose: This meta-analysis was aimed to evaluate the role of postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (post-CCRT) for esophageal cancer patients after surgery. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, PMC, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure and Wanfang databases. Studies which compared CCRT with non-CCRT treatment for esophageal cancer patients after surgery were eligible. Outcomes of interest were odds ratios (OR) for overall survival (OS), local-regional recurrence rate, distant metastasis rate and adverse-event rate. Results: Thirteen studies with 2165 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Post-CCRT significantly improved OS for esophageal cancer patients. Comparing the CCRT group with the non-CCRT one, the OR and 95% confidence interval (CI) for 1-year, 3-year and 5-year OS were 1.66 [1.30-2.11], 1.50 [1.24-1.81] and 1.54 [1.22-1.94], respectively. The local-regional recurrence rate was significantly reduced in the CCRT group (OR=0.58, 95% CI=0.46-0.72), but no significant difference was observed in the distant metastasis rate between the CCRT and non-CCRT groups (OR=0.94, 95% CI=0.68-1.30). Post-CCRT didn't increase the risk of pneumonitis, anastomotic stenosis or severe hematologic toxicities. Mild esophagitis in the CCRT group was increased but could be well tolerated. Conclusions: This meta-analysis based on the largest-scale of published literature confirms that post-CCRT yields significant survival benefit and improves local-regional control with tolerable toxicity for patients with esophageal carcinoma.
DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(07)70039-6
发表时间: 2007-03-01
期刊: LANCET ONCOLOGY
影响因子: 51.1
作者:
Gebski, Val;Burmeister, Bryan;Simes, John
通讯作者: Simes, John
DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x
发表时间: 2000-06-01
期刊: BIOMETRICS
影响因子: 1.9
作者:
Duval, S;Tweedie, R
通讯作者: Tweedie, R
DOI: 10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.02748.x
发表时间: 2003-09-01
影响因子: 1.7
作者:
Slim, K;Nini, E;Chipponi, J
通讯作者: Chipponi, J
DOI: 10.3322/caac.21262
发表时间: 2015-03-01
影响因子: 254.7
作者:
Torre, Lindsey A.;Bray, Freddie;Jemal, Ahmedin
通讯作者: Jemal, Ahmedin
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5223(03)01025-0
发表时间: 2003-11-01
影响因子: 6
作者:
Rice, TW;Adelstein, DJ;Blackstone, EH
通讯作者: Blackstone, EH