Information Quality Frameworks for Digital Health Technologies: Systematic Review.

Information Quality Frameworks for Digital Health Technologies: Systematic Review.
复制标题

DOI:
10.2196/23479
复制
发表时间:
2021-05-17
影响因子:
7.4
通讯作者:
O'Donoghue J
O'Donoghue J
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Fadahunsi KP;O'Connor S;Akinlua JT;Wark PA;Gallagher J;Carroll C;Car J;Majeed A;O'Donoghue J

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

数字健康技术(DHT)产生了大量用于医疗保健的信息,用于行政、教育、研究和临床目的。临床上使用数字信息进行诊断、治疗和预后有多种患者安全问题,其中一些是由于信息质量(IQ)差造成的。本系统性综述旨在综合一个IQ框架,该框架可用于评估数字健康信息适用于临床目的的程度。该综述根据PRISMA(系统性综述和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指南进行。我们检索了Embase、MEDLINE、PubMed、CINAHL、Maternity and Infant Care、PsycINFO、Global Health、ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global、Scopus和HMIC(the Health Management Information Consortium),从成立到2019年10月。多维智商框架评估用于临床背景下的卫生保健专业人员使用的DHT。一个主题合成方法被用来合成临床信息质量(CLIQ)的数字健康框架。我们确定了10个现有的IQ框架,并从这些框架中开发了具有13个独特维度的数字健康CLIQ框架:可访问性,完整性,可移植性,安全性,及时性,准确性,可解释性,可解释性,出处,相关性,一致性,一致性和可维护性,这些维度被分为3个有意义的类别:可用性,信息性和可用性。本系统性综述强调了DHT IQ的重要性及其与患者安全的相关性。数字健康的CLIQ框架将有助于评估和概念化与数字健康相关的IQ问题,从而预防潜在的患者安全问题。PROSPERO国际系统性综述前瞻性登记中心CRD 42018097142; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?记录ID =97142 RR 2 -10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024722
Digital health technologies (DHTs) generate a large volume of information used in health care for administrative, educational, research, and clinical purposes. The clinical use of digital information for diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic purposes has multiple patient safety problems, some of which result from poor information quality (IQ). This systematic review aims to synthesize an IQ framework that could be used to evaluate the extent to which digital health information is fit for clinical purposes. The review was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines. We searched Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, Maternity and Infant Care, PsycINFO, Global Health, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global, Scopus, and HMIC (the Health Management Information Consortium) from inception until October 2019. Multidimensional IQ frameworks for assessing DHTs used in the clinical context by health care professionals were included. A thematic synthesis approach was used to synthesize the Clinical Information Quality (CLIQ) framework for digital health. We identified 10 existing IQ frameworks from which we developed the CLIQ framework for digital health with 13 unique dimensions: accessibility, completeness, portability, security, timeliness, accuracy, interpretability, plausibility, provenance, relevance, conformance, consistency, and maintainability, which were categorized into 3 meaningful categories: availability, informativeness, and usability. This systematic review highlights the importance of the IQ of DHTs and its relevance to patient safety. The CLIQ framework for digital health will be useful in evaluating and conceptualizing IQ issues associated with digital health, thus forestalling potential patient safety problems. PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42018097142; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=97142 RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024722
健康信息技术对患者安全的影响。
DOI: 10.15537/smj.2017.12.20631
发表时间: 2017-12
影响因子: 1.6
作者:
Alotaibi YK;Federico F
通讯作者: Federico F
DOI: 10.1080/0142159031000136815
发表时间: 2003-07-01
期刊: MEDICAL TEACHER
影响因子: 4.7
作者:
Haig, A;Dozier, M
通讯作者: Dozier, M
公共卫生信息系统数据质量评估方法综述。
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph110505170
发表时间: 2014-05-14
影响因子: --
作者:
Chen H;Hailey D;Wang N;Yu P
通讯作者: Yu P
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-37
发表时间: 2013-03-13
影响因子: 4
作者:
Carroll C;Booth A;Leaviss J;Rick J
通讯作者: Rick J
DOI: 10.1108/02641610610686012
发表时间: 2006-01-01
期刊: INTERLENDING & DOCUMENT SUPPLY
影响因子: --
作者:
Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Cherifa;Schopfel, Joachim
通讯作者: Schopfel, Joachim