On the need for Embodied and Dis-Embodied Cognition.

On the need for Embodied and Dis-Embodied Cognition.
复制标题

DOI:
10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00242
复制
发表时间:
2010
影响因子:
3.8
通讯作者:
Dove G
Dove G
中科院分区:
心理学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Dove G

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

本文提出并辩护了一种多元的概念体现理论。我们的概念至少有两种表现方式:(I)通过对我们与物体和事件交互的感觉运动模拟;(Ii)通过对自然语言处理的感觉运动模拟。语言表征是“非具体化的”,因为它们是动态的和多通道的,但与其他形式的具身认知不同,它们不继承这个具体化的语义内容。在语言表征之间的联系和推理关系中存储信息的能力扩展了我们的认知范围,并为我们抽象和概括的能力提供了解释。这一理论得到了许多实证考虑的支持,包括来自认知神经科学和神经心理学的大量证据支持对想象效应的多重语义代码解释。
This essay proposes and defends a pluralistic theory of conceptual embodiment. Our concepts are represented in at least two ways: (i) through sensorimotor simulations of our interactions with objects and events and (ii) through sensorimotor simulations of natural language processing. Linguistic representations are “dis-embodied” in the sense that they are dynamic and multimodal but, in contrast to other forms of embodied cognition, do not inherit semantic content from this embodiment. The capacity to store information in the associations and inferential relationships among linguistic representations extends our cognitive reach and provides an explanation of our ability to abstract and generalize. This theory is supported by a number of empirical considerations, including the large body of evidence from cognitive neuroscience and neuropsychology supporting a multiple semantic code explanation of imageability effects.
DOI: 10.1162/0898929054021102
发表时间: 2005-06-01
影响因子: 3.2
作者:
Binder, JR;Westbury, CF;Medler, DA
通讯作者: Medler, DA
DOI: 10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00059-1
发表时间: 1999-12-17
期刊: COGNITION
影响因子: 3.4
作者:
Altmann, GTM;Kamide, Y
通讯作者: Kamide, Y
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1319
发表时间: 2003-07-29
影响因子: 6.3
作者:
Barsalou, LW
通讯作者: Barsalou, LW
DOI: 10.1016/s0911-6044(01)00030-6
发表时间: 2002-05-01
影响因子: 2
作者:
Berndt, RS;Haendiges, AN;Mitchum, CC
通讯作者: Mitchum, CC
DOI: 10.1080/02687038908248981
发表时间: 1989-03-01
期刊: APHASIOLOGY
影响因子: 2
作者:
BATES, E;WULFECK, B
通讯作者: WULFECK, B