Worldwide fertility declines do not rely on stopping at ideal parities

Worldwide fertility declines do not rely on stopping at ideal parities
复制标题

全球生育率下降并不依赖于理想生育率的下降

DOI:
10.1080/00324728.2018.1513164
复制
发表时间:
2018
期刊:
Population Studies
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Drake, Alexandria
Drake, Alexandria
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hruschka, Daniel J.;Sear, Rebecca;Hackman, Joseph;Drake, Alexandria

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

一个关键的人口假设是,生育率的下降取决于目标胎次,但新出现的证据表明,妇女经常在没有具体数字目标的情况下降低生育率。为了评估这两种途径对生育率下降的相对重要性,我们开发了一种新的混合模型来估计:(1)在目标产次停止的妇女比例;(2)未达到目标产次的妇女的平均完成生育率。将该模型应用于84个中低收入国家45-49岁妇女的人口与健康调查数据以及美国人口普查组群,结果显示,在特定的胎次(1%-84%)上,这一比例有相当大的差异。 估计数还显示,完成生育率的下降主要归因于妇女没有达到目标胎次,这表明,在广泛的生育率转变中,达到理想胎次可能不如不依赖胎次的决定重要。
A key demographic hypothesis has been that fertility declines rely on stopping at target parities, but emerging evidence suggests that women frequently reduce fertility without specific numeric targets. To assess the relative importance of these two paths to fertility decline, we develop a novel mixture model to estimate: (1) the proportion of women who stop at a target parity; and (2) mean completed fertility among those who do not. Applied to Demographic and Health Survey data from women aged 45–49 in 84 low- and middle-income countries, and to United States Census cohorts, the model shows considerable variation in the proportion stopping at specific parities (1–84 per cent). The estimates also show that declines in completed fertility are largely attributable to women who do not stop at target parities, suggesting that stopping at ideal parities may be less important than parity-independent decisions for a wide range of fertility transitions.
欧洲生育转变之前的故意生育间隔:来自十九世纪比利时的证据
DOI: --
发表时间: 2004
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
J. Bavel
通讯作者: J. Bavel
重新思考历史性的生殖变化:来自西班牙城镇纵向数据的见解
DOI: --
发表时间: 2007
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
D. Reher;A. Sanz
通讯作者: A. Sanz
使用零膨胀计数回归模型来估计美国女性的生育能力
DOI: --
发表时间: 2003
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
D. Poston;Sherry L. McKibben
通讯作者: Sherry L. McKibben
发展中国家家庭限制需求的趋势。
DOI: --
发表时间: 2000
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
C. Westoff;A. Bankole
通讯作者: A. Bankole
偶然的生活:西非的生育率、时间和老龄化
DOI: 10.2307/3097687
发表时间: 2002
影响因子: 3.7
作者:
C. Bledsoe
通讯作者: C. Bledsoe