Blade production of Shuidonggou Locality1 (Northwest China): A technological perspective

Blade production of Shuidonggou Locality1 (Northwest China): A technological perspective
复制标题

水洞沟地区1(中国西北地区)叶片生产:技术视角

DOI:
10.1016/j.quaint.2014.04.041
复制
发表时间:
2014-10
影响因子:
2.2
通讯作者:
Xing Gao
Xing Gao
中科院分区:
地球科学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Fei Peng;Humin Wang;Xing Gao

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

水洞沟1号地(SDG1)是东亚地区最重要的早期叶片组合之一,自1923年发现以来,人们对其进行了详细的挖掘和研究。然而,大多数研究集中在类型学和定性分析以及年代学和地层学等背景问题上。本文概述了目前关于其年代学和地层学的争论,并支持SDG1较低文化层40,000-25,000 BP的保守时间范围。利用cha<s:1> ne opsamatoire和属性分析相结合的方法,我们对SDG1岩片组合进行了定量技术分析。我们的分析表明,叶片生产采用了两种不同的策略。(1)主要还原序列产生标准叶片、长片和宽面岩心叶片,且以双向断裂为主。在一些宽面岩心上,剥落面扩展到窄面。在这种情况下,战略从宽面转向亚棱柱形核心方法。(2)第二种(不太常见的)还原系统从棱柱形和窄面芯中产生叶片和叶片。我们的研究结果还表明,SDG1叶片的生产完全基于直接冲击,而不是压力或间接冲击剥落,尽管有时会使用边缘冲击。将SDG1与东北亚其他初始上旧石器时代和早期上旧石器时代(EUP)进行比较,我们认为SDG1组合在类型和技术上与西伯利亚和蒙古阿尔泰地区的IUP组合相似。考虑到SDG1具有SDG1组合中的一些EUP技术特征,我们不能排除EUP技术入侵的可能性。
Shuidonggou Locality 1 (SDG1) contains one of the most important early blade assemblages in East Asia, and has been excavated and studied in detail since its discovery in 1923. However, most studies focus on typology and qualitative analysis along with contextual problems such as chronology and stratigraphy. This article outlines current debates on its chronology and stratigraphy, and supports a conservative wide temporal range for the SDG1 lower cultural layer of 40,000–25,000 BP. Using a combined chaîne opératoire and attribute analytical approach, we provide a quantitative technological analysis of the SDG1 lithic assemblage. Our analysis indicates that blade production was applied using two different strategies. (1) The main reduction sequence produced standard blades, elongated flakes and bladelets from broad-faced cores, and mostly from bidirectional knapping. On some broad-faced cores, the flaking surface expands to the narrow facets. In this case, the strategy shifts from a broad-faced to sub-prismatic core approach. (2) The second (and less common) reduction system produced blades and bladelets from prismatic and narrow-faced cores. Our results also indicate that SDG1 blade production was based exclusively on direct percussion and not on pressure or indirect percussion flaking, though marginal percussion was sometimes used. Comparing SDG1 with other Initial Upper Paleolithic and Early Upper Paleolithic (EUP) in Northeast Asia, we suggest the SDG1 assemblages are typologically and technologically similar to the IUP assemblage in the Altai region of Siberia and Mongolia. Given the wide chronological range of SDG1 with some EUP technological features in SDG1 assemblage, we cannot exclude the possibility of incursion of EUP technology.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2009.10.028
发表时间: 2010-03
影响因子: 2.8
作者:
P. Villa;S. Soriano;Nicolas Teyssandier;S. Wurz
通讯作者: P. Villa;S. Soriano;Nicolas Teyssandier;S. Wurz
DOI: 10.1016/j.aeae.2012.11.003
发表时间: 2012-09
期刊: Archaeology, Ethnology and Anthropology of Eurasia
影响因子: --
作者:
L. Meignen
通讯作者: L. Meignen
中国旧石器时代晚期的发展:水洞沟遗址的新成果
DOI: 10.1017/s0003598x00049000
发表时间: 2013-06
期刊: Antiquity
影响因子: 1.8
作者:
Shuangquan Zhang;Ying Guan;Huimin Wang;Steven L. Kuhn
通讯作者: Steven L. Kuhn
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2012.01.031
发表时间: 2012-06
影响因子: 2.8
作者:
Jayne Wilkins;M. Chazan
通讯作者: Jayne Wilkins;M. Chazan
DOI: 10.3998/jar.0521004.0065.303
发表时间: 2009-09
影响因子: 0.7
作者:
C. Seong
通讯作者: C. Seong