Telephone Surveys in Europe

Telephone Surveys in Europe
复制标题

欧洲电话调查

DOI:
10.1007/978-3-642-25411-6
复制
发表时间:
2012
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Kühne
Kühne
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Häder;Sabine;Häder;Michael;Kühne

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

介绍与面对面访谈相比,通过电话进行调查有许多优点,特别是如果调查是由电话中心进行的(Häder 2009):∙ 可以在短时间内实现大量样本。或只有轻微影响。∙ 访调员影响可能较小。∙ 担心让访调员进入家中不会在电话调查中发挥作用。∙ 许多面对面调查需要对样本案例进行(区域)聚类,这会导致设计效果超出访调员在(区域)样本点工作所造成的影响。其结果是,面对面调查需要更多次数的访谈才能获得相同的精度。
IntroductionSurveying people on the telephone has a number of advantages compared to face-to-face interviews, especially if the survey is carried out by telephone centres (Häder 2009):∙ Large samples can be realized within short periods.∙ It is easy to call households that are difficult to access frequently.∙ Monitoring interviewers (defining cases as ineligible, interviewing the actually sampled individuals, conducting the interview according to defined protocols, etc.) is easy.∙ The influence of third persons is likely to have no or only minor effects.∙ Interviewer effects are likely to be smaller.∙ The fear of letting an interviewer into the house does not play a role in telephone surveys.∙ Many face-to-face surveys need (regional) clustering of sample cases which causes design effects over and above those caused by interviewers who work (regional) sample points. The consequence is that a higher number of interviews are necessary in face-to-face surveys to obtain the same precision.
DOI: --
发表时间: 2003
期刊: Political Analysis
影响因子: 5.4
作者:
R. Voogt;W. Saris
通讯作者: W. Saris
论在响应的结果误差和不响应的偏差之间实现经济平衡的概率机制
DOI: --
发表时间: 1953
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
W. Deming
通讯作者: W. Deming
MMPI 中的社会期望。
DOI: --
发表时间: 1956
期刊: Journal of Consulting Psychology
影响因子: --
作者:
W. Fordyce
通讯作者: W. Fordyce
DOI: --
发表时间: 2007
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
C. Steeh;Linda B Piekarski
通讯作者: Linda B Piekarski
调查中的反应效应:回顾与综合
DOI: 10.2307/2285784
发表时间: 1974
期刊: The Lancet
影响因子: --
作者:
S. Sudman;N. Bradburn
通讯作者: N. Bradburn