Machine Learning to Predict Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Machine Learning to Predict Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction.
复制标题

机器学习预测急性心肌梗死患者对比剂引起的急性肾损伤

DOI:
10.3389/fmed.2020.592007
复制
发表时间:
2020
影响因子:
3.9
通讯作者:
Zhang F
Zhang F
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Sun L;Zhu W;Chen X;Jiang J;Ji Y;Liu N;Xu Y;Zhuang Y;Sun Z;Wang Q;Zhang F

文献摘要

参考文献

相似文献

目的:建立有创治疗的急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者中造影剂诱导的急性肾损伤(CI-AKI)的预测模型。研究方法:入选接受血管造影治疗的AMI患者,并随机分为培训队列(75%)和验证队列(25%)。使用机器学习算法来构建CI-AKI的预测模型。在验证队列中测试预测模型。结果:共纳入1,495例AMI患者。在所有患者中,226例(15.1%)发生了CI-AKI。在验证队列中,具有前15个变量的随机森林(RF)模型的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.82(95% CI:0.76-0.87),而最佳逻辑模型的AUC为0.69(95% CI:0.62-0.76)。ACEF(年龄、肌酐和射血分数)模型的AUC为0.62(95% CI:0.53-0.71)。在验证组中,前15个变量的RF模型达到了71.9%的高召回率和73.5%的准确率。随机森林模型在每次比较中均显著优于逻辑回归。结论:机器学习算法特别是随机森林算法提高了AMI患者风险分层的准确性,应用于准确识别AMI患者的CI-AKI风险。
Objective: To develop predictive models for contrast induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) among acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients treated invasively. Methods: Patients with AMI who underwent angiography therapy were enrolled and randomly divided into training cohort (75%) and validation cohort (25%). Machine learning algorithms were used to construct predictive models for CI-AKI. The predictive models were tested in a validation cohort. Results: A total of 1,495 patients with AMI were included. Of all the patients, 226 (15.1%) cases developed CI-AKI. In the validation cohort, Random Forest (RF) model with top 15 variables reached an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.76–0.87), while the best logistic model had an AUC of 0.69 (95% CI: 0.62–0.76). ACEF (age, creatinine, and ejection fraction) model reached an AUC of 0.62 (95% CI: 0.53–0.71). RF model with top 15 variables achieved a high recall rate of 71.9% and an accuracy of 73.5% in the validation group. Random Forest model significantly outperformed logistic regression in every comparison. Conclusions: Machine learning algorithms especially Random Forest algorithm improves the accuracy of risk stratifying patients with AMI and should be used to accurately identify the risk of CI-AKI in AMI patients.
DOI: 10.1161/circresaha.117.311312
发表时间: 2017-10-13
影响因子: 20.1
作者:
Ambale-Venkatesh B;Yang X;Wu CO;Liu K;Hundley WG;McClelland R;Gomes AS;Folsom AR;Shea S;Guallar E;Bluemke DA;Lima JAC
通讯作者: Lima JAC
DOI: 10.2337/dc16-0826
发表时间: 2017-02-01
期刊: DIABETES CARE
影响因子: 16.2
作者:
Bertsimas, Dimitris;Kallus, Nathan;Zhuo, Ying Daisy
通讯作者: Zhuo, Ying Daisy
DOI: 10.14744/anatoljcardiol.2018.38228
发表时间: 2019-02-01
影响因子: 1.3
作者:
Lin, Chunjin;Lin, Kaiyang;Zhu, Pengli
通讯作者: Zhu, Pengli
DOI: 10.18637/jss.v036.i11
发表时间: 2010-09-01
影响因子: 5.8
作者:
Kursa, Miron B.;Rudnicki, Witold R.
通讯作者: Rudnicki, Witold R.
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-017-1547-6
发表时间: 2017-02-20
期刊: BMC bioinformatics
影响因子: 3
作者:
Shah JS;Rai SN;DeFilippis AP;Hill BG;Bhatnagar A;Brock GN
通讯作者: Brock GN