How advances in neural recording affect data analysis.

How advances in neural recording affect data analysis.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1038/nn.2731
复制
发表时间:
2011-02
影响因子:
25
通讯作者:
Kording, Konrad P.
Kording, Konrad P.
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Stevenson, Ian H.;Kording, Konrad P.

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

在过去的五十年中,神经元的进展使简单记录的神经元数量大约是每7年的两倍,从而模仿了摩尔定律,神经元是根据刺激或运动的调整来独立分析的。不受越来越多的简单记录神经元的影响,随着新兴神经元的数量增加,分析神经元之间的相互作用的新技术变得更加准确,更复杂。记录神经元数量的指数增长。
Over the last five decades, progress in neural recording techniques has allowed the number of simultaneously recorded neurons to double approximately every 7 years, mimicking Moore’s law. Such exponential growth motivates us to ask how data analysis techniques are affected by progressively larger numbers of recorded neurons. Traditionally, neurons are analyzed independently on the basis of their tuning to stimuli or movement. Although tuning curve approaches are unaffected by growing numbers of simultaneously recorded neurons, newly developed techniques that analyze interactions between neurons become more accurate and more complex as the number of recorded neurons increases. Emerging data analysis techniques should consider both the computational costs and the potential for more accurate models associated with this exponential growth of the number of recorded neurons.
DOI: 10.1038/nature07140
发表时间: 2008-08-21
期刊: Nature
影响因子: 64.8
作者:
Pillow JW;Shlens J;Paninski L;Sher A;Litke AM;Chichilnisky EJ;Simoncelli EP
通讯作者: Simoncelli EP
DOI: 10.1088/0954-898x/15/4/002
发表时间: 2004-11-01
影响因子: 7.8
作者:
Paninski, L
通讯作者: Paninski, L
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00438.2003
发表时间: 2004-04-01
影响因子: 2.5
作者:
Brockwell, AE;Rojas, AL;Kass, RE
通讯作者: Kass, RE
DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(81)90035-3
发表时间: 1981-01-01
期刊: ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
影响因子: --
作者:
BARNA, JS;AREZZO, JC;VAUGHAN, HG
通讯作者: VAUGHAN, HG
DOI: 10.1038/nature01834
发表时间: 2003-07-31
期刊: NATURE
影响因子: 64.8
作者:
Harris, KD;Csicsvari, J;Buzsáki, G
通讯作者: Buzsáki, G