Designing for reimagined communities
Designing for reimagined communities
复制标题
为重新构想的社区进行设计
DOI：
10.1080/15710882.2021.2021245
复制
发表时间：
2021
期刊：
影响因子：
1.8
通讯作者：
McHattie L
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
McHattie L
在基于场所的设计研究中，社区的概念已经成为一个越来越重要的参考点，特别是在共同设计和参与式设计领域。本期特刊“为重新想象的社区设计”是由英国艺术与人文研究委员会资助的项目“设计创新与土地资产：迈向新社区”发展而来的。在这里，对社区设计中可用的参与性和合作性框架的回顾揭示了一个广阔的方向。仅在参与式设计（PD）中，20年来从工作场所到公民舞台的转变（Bjögvinsson, Ehn, and Hillgren 2012）导致了社区方法的激增（DiSalvo, Clement, and Volkmar 2013）。在更广泛的协同设计中，社区可以被视为个人、公民和更广泛的参与者群体的“聚集”（Steen 2013）。这种聚集可能是地理邻近性的问题——人们居住在同一地点，因此有着相似的基于地点的关注——社会、文化、基础设施或其他方面（Calvo和De Rosa 2017）。另一种情况是，当地的关注本身可能会优先考虑。在这种情况下，不管他们的基础是在一个特定的地方，“社区”将围绕他们参与一个特定的“问题”而形成（Latour和Weibel 2005）。在为社区设计和与社区合作的过程中，设计师的任务是制定响应，因为他们寻求通过解决他们的关注点和问题来支持社区。这种合作的目的可能是具体和有针对性的，例如，探索共享资源和土地资产（如建筑物或公园）的最佳利用（Halse et al. 2010）。同样，目标可能在更广泛的范围内，例如，可能需要检查特定的民主或制度方法或影响政策，可能在地方政府层面或超越（Huybrechts, Benesch, and Geib 2017; Kimbell and Bailey 2017）。从表面上看，这样的解释似乎或多或少是直截了当的——社区根据他们的问题或关注点采取特定的形式——然后设计师与他们合作，形成以设计为主导的回应。然而，这种描述缺少的是对必须事先采取的步骤的理解。具体来说，设计如何支持社区“走到一起”的过程，围绕问题或关注点建立合作。还有一个问题是，在社区参与的过程中，设计是如何吸引人的
Within place-based design research, the concept of community has become an increasingly important reference point, particularly in relation to the areas of co-design and participatory design. This Special Issue ‘Designing for Reimagined Communities’ developed outwards from a UK Arts and Humanities Research Council funded programme Design Innovation & Land-Assets: Towards new communities. Here, a review of the available participatory and collaborative framings of the community in design revealed a broad landscape of directions.In Participatory Design (PD) alone, the two-decade move from the workplace to the civic arena (Bjögvinsson, Ehn, and Hillgren 2012) has led to a proliferation of community-based approaches (DiSalvo, Clement, and Volkmar 2013). In co-design more broadly, community can be seen to mark a ‘coming together’of individuals, citizens, and broader groups of participants (Steen 2013). This coming together may be a matter of geographical proximity–people reside in the same location and as such share similar place-based concerns–social, cultural, infrastructural, or otherwise (Calvo and De Rosa 2017). Alternatively, it may be that local concerns themselves take precedence. In this case, regardless of their grounding in a particular place, the ‘community’will be formed around their involvement in a specific ‘issue’(Latour and Weibel 2005). In designing for and with communities, designers are tasked with formulating a response as they seek to support communities through the process of addressing their concerns and issues. The aim of such engagements may be specific and targeted, for example, exploring the best use of shared resources and land assets such as a building or public park (Halse et al. 2010). Equally, aims may be broader in scope, for example, there may be a need to examine specific democratic or institutional approaches or influence policy, perhaps at the level of local government or beyond (Huybrechts, Benesch, and Geib 2017; Kimbell and Bailey 2017). On the face of it, such an account would appear to be more or less straightforward–communities take on their particular form based on their issues or concerns–and thereafter designers work with them to formulate a design-led response. However, what is missing from this account is an understanding of the steps that must take place beforehand. Specifically, how design supports the process of communities ‘coming together’, of establishing collaborations around issues or concerns. There is also the question of how, within the process of community engagement and beyond, design draws
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
1
作者：
Calvo, Mirian;De Rosa, Annalinda
通讯作者：
De Rosa, Annalinda
影响因子：
3.3
作者：
B. Latour;P. Weibel
通讯作者：
P. Weibel
原型设计和新的政策制定精神
影响因子：
1.8
作者：
Kimbell L
通讯作者：
Kimbell L
制度化：参与式设计、协同设计和公共领域
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
Liesbeth Huybrechts;H. Benesch;J. Geib
通讯作者：
J. Geib
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2003
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
J. Engel
通讯作者：
J. Engel