The Social Contract Revisited: Evidence from Communist and State Capitalist Economies

The Social Contract Revisited: Evidence from Communist and State Capitalist Economies
复制标题

重新审视社会契约:来自共产主义和国家资本主义经济的证据

DOI:
10.1080/09668136.2016.1267714
复制
发表时间:
2017
影响因子:
1.4
通讯作者:
Cook L
Cook L
中科院分区:
法学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Cook L

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

社会契约论将共产主义专制政权的稳定解释为政权与民众之间的隐性交换的结果:公民保持沉默,政权为他们提供稳定的工作、社会服务、补贴住房和消费品。我们的文章探讨了社会契约论在三种不同类型的政权中的适用程度。我们回顾了经典文献的社会主义社会契约的新档案证据在苏联。然后,我们转向改革时期的中国和普京的俄罗斯,发现这些后社会主义政权创造了独特的“市场社会契约”。我们的研究表明,共产主义和威权主义领导人在战略上努力保持执政地位,以满足民众的消费需求,并强调了大规模拉拢对于解释持久威权主义的核心作用。
The social contract thesis explained stability in communist autocracies as a consequence of an implicit exchange between the regime and the populace: citizens remained quiescent and the regime provided them with secure jobs, social services, subsidised housing, and consumer goods. Our essay asks how well the social contract thesis applies in three different types of regimes. We review classic literature on the socialist social contract in light of newly available archival evidence on the Soviet Union. We turn then to reform-era China and Putin’s Russia, finding that these post-socialist regimes create distinctive ‘market social contracts’. Our work shows that communist and authoritarian leaders cater to the consumption needs of populations in a strategic effort to remain in office and highlights the centrality of mass cooptation for explaining durable authoritarianism.
DOI: 10.1017/s0305741009991068
发表时间: 2010-03-16
期刊: CHINA QUARTERLY
影响因子: 2.5
作者:
Klotzbuecher, Sascha;Laessig, Peter;Qin Jiangmei;Weigelin-Schwiedrzik, Susanne
通讯作者: Weigelin-Schwiedrzik, Susanne
共产主义揭开:冷战东欧的消费
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199827657.001.0001
发表时间: 2012
影响因子: 1.9
作者:
Paulina Bren;M. Neuburger
通讯作者: M. Neuburger
后共产主义国家的福利谈判
DOI: 10.5129/001041507x12911361134398
发表时间: 2007
影响因子: 2.3
作者:
L. Cook
通讯作者: L. Cook
斯大林的继任者:苏联的领导、稳定和变革
DOI: 10.2307/25140368
发表时间: 1982
影响因子: 2.3
作者:
Seweryn Bialer
通讯作者: Seweryn Bialer
工作中的政治机器:工作场所的选民动员和选举颠覆
DOI: 10.1017/s004388711400001x
发表时间: 2014
期刊: World Politics
影响因子: 5
作者:
Timothy Frye;O. J. Reuter;David Szakonyi
通讯作者: David Szakonyi