New Materialism? A View from Sociology of Knowledge

New Materialism? A View from Sociology of Knowledge
复制标题

新唯物主义?

DOI:
10.1007/978-3-658-22300-7_8
复制
发表时间:
2019
期刊:
Discussing New Materialism
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Keller
Keller
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Keller

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

新唯物主义和相关的转向使社会研究面临严重的批评,因为它忽视了事物的作用和物质在其研究中的作用。它为这类研究提出了一种新的本体论和认识论,与更好地理解世俗给予及其过程的承诺相联系。这篇论文承认有必要对社会分析和社会学研究进行一些修正或复杂化,但它拒绝接受严厉的批评及其基本论点。有鉴于此,它回顾了在解释性知识社会学中确立的客体和实质性的概念,并主张在这一视角下进行材料敏感的社会学研究,并特别关注话语研究。因此,它首先提出了反对新唯物主义和社会学相关转向的核心批判性论点。在第二步中,它论证了如何在知识社会学中处理实质性问题。第三步将考虑实质性如何在以知识为基础的话语研究的社会学中发挥作用。
New materialism and related turns confront social research with serious criticisms for neglecting the role of things and materiality in its research. It proposes a new ontology and epistemology for such research linked to the promise of a better understanding of the worldly given and its processes. This paper acknowledges the need for some correction or complexification of social analysis and sociological research, but it rejects the harshness of the critique as well as its basic arguments. Against this it recalls the conception of objects and materiality established in interpretative sociology of knowledge and argues for a material sensitive sociological research in such a perspective, with a particular attention to discourse studies. Therefore it first presents core critical arguments against new materialism and related turns in sociology. In a second step it argues how questions of materiality can (and have been) dealt with in the sociology of knowledge. A third step will consider how materiality comes into play in sociology of knowledge-based discourse studies.
事实的问题和问题的事实
DOI: --
发表时间: 2014
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
M. Lynch
通讯作者: M. Lynch
DOI: --
发表时间: 2018
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
R. Keller
通讯作者: R. Keller
DOI: 10.1086/345321
发表时间: 2003-03-01
期刊: SIGNS
影响因子: 1.9
作者:
Barad, K
通讯作者: Barad, K
DOI: 10.1215/9780822383574
发表时间: 2020
影响因子: 1.6
作者:
B. Massumi
通讯作者: B. Massumi
新唯物主义:本体论、能动性和政治
DOI: --
发表时间: 2010
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Diana H Coole;S. Frost
通讯作者: S. Frost