Geometric interpretation of gene coexpression network analysis.
Geometric interpretation of gene coexpression network analysis.
复制标题
基因共表达网络分析的几何解释。
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000117
复制
发表时间:
2008-08-15
影响因子:
4.3
通讯作者:
Dong, Jun
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Horvath, Steve;Dong, Jun
The merging of network theory and microarray data analysis techniques has spawned a new field: gene coexpression network analysis. While network methods are increasingly used in biology, the network vocabulary of computational biologists tends to be far more limited than that of, say, social network theorists. Here we review and propose several potentially useful network concepts. We take advantage of the relationship between network theory and the field of microarray data analysis to clarify the meaning of and the relationship among network concepts in gene coexpression networks. Network theory offers a wealth of intuitive concepts for describing the pairwise relationships among genes, which are depicted in cluster trees and heat maps. Conversely, microarray data analysis techniques (singular value decomposition, tests of differential expression) can also be used to address difficult problems in network theory. We describe conditions when a close relationship exists between network analysis and microarray data analysis techniques, and provide a rough dictionary for translating between the two fields. Using the angular interpretation of correlations, we provide a geometric interpretation of network theoretic concepts and derive unexpected relationships among them. We use the singular value decomposition of module expression data to characterize approximately factorizable gene coexpression networks, i.e., adjacency matrices that factor into node specific contributions. High and low level views of coexpression networks allow us to study the relationships among modules and among module genes, respectively. We characterize coexpression networks where hub genes are significant with respect to a microarray sample trait and show that the network concept of intramodular connectivity can be interpreted as a fuzzy measure of module membership. We illustrate our results using human, mouse, and yeast microarray gene expression data. The unification of coexpression network methods with traditional data mining methods can inform the application and development of systems biologic methods. Similar to natural languages, network language is ever evolving. While some network terms (concepts) are widely used in gene coexpression network analysis, others still need to be developed to meet the ever increasing demand for describing the system of gene transcripts. There is a need to provide an intuitive geometric explanation of network concepts and to study their relationships. For example, we show that certain seemingly disparate network concepts turn out to be synonyms in the context of coexpression modules. We show how coexpression network language affects our understanding of biology. For example, there are geometric reasons why highly connected hub genes in important coexpression modules tend to be important, and why hub genes in one module cannot be hubs in another distinct module. We provide a short dictionary for translating between microarray data analysis language and network theory language to facilitate communication between the two fields. We describe several examples that illustrate how the two data analysis fields can inform each other.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.1073/pnas.150242097
发表时间:
2000-07-18
影响因子:
11.1
作者:
Holter, NS;Mitra, M;Fedoroff, NV
通讯作者:
Fedoroff, NV
DOI:
10.1073/pnas.97.18.10101
发表时间:
2000-08-29
影响因子:
11.1
作者:
Alter, O;Brown, PO;Botstein, D
通讯作者:
Botstein, D
影响因子:
9.9
作者:
通讯作者:
--
影响因子:
64.8
作者:
Albert, R;Jeong, H;Barabási, AL
通讯作者:
Barabási, AL
影响因子:
4
作者:
Albert, R
通讯作者:
Albert, R