Guidance for Addressing Conflicts, Bias, and Growth in Early Career Tobacco Regulatory Science Training Through Mentorship.
Guidance for Addressing Conflicts, Bias, and Growth in Early Career Tobacco Regulatory Science Training Through Mentorship.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1093/ntr/ntad162
复制
发表时间：
2024-01-01
影响因子：
4.7
通讯作者：
Stanton, Cassandra A.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Stroup, Andrea M.;Villanti, Andrea C.;Pfund, Christine;Benjamin, Emelia J.;Denlinger-Apte, Rachel L.;Garcia-Cazarin, Mary L.;Kwan, Jonathan;Stanton, Cassandra A.
烟草监管科学(TRS)是支持对烟草监管决策的风险和收益进行评估并为监管政策提供强有力的科学基础的科学学科。1TRS包括许多学科，包括人口科学、毒性、烟草控制政策、药理学、产品科学以及营销和传播等。2、3自2013年以来，TRS培训项目的开发和评估一直是由美国烟草制品食品和药物管理局中心(FDA CTP)和美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)资助的研究中心，特别是通过烟草监管科学中心(TCORS)、烟草监管科学培训和研究评估与协调中心(CECTR)和烟草监管科学分析、科学、增强和物流协调中心(CASEL)。这些努力启动了TRS领域，并产生了对新计划的需求，以满足TRS学员及其导师的独特需求，包括为所有FDA CTP资助的TRS受赠者协调的培训和指导计划。为了支持TRS科学家的专业发展，参与TCORS的调查人员最初与CECTR合作，现在与CASEL合作一系列项目，为TRS培训和指导提供信息。首先，Wipfli和他的同事4概述了TRS特定的领域和能力，这些领域和能力表征了在该领域取得成功所需的内容知识和技能水平。然后，Russo和他的同事对资深和早期职业科学家进行了深入的采访，以确定TRS的特点，使其有别于其他研究领域，并描述了该领域指导的困难。Di France和他的同事6通过开发、实施和评估一项新的TRS导师培训计划，建立在这些先前研究的基础上。这篇评论的目的是通过强调在NIH通过烟草管制科学计划(TRSP)由TRS资助的培训的第一个十年中，受训者、博士后和博士后研究员以及新的和早期的研究人员(以下统称为被辅导者)所出现的TRS特有的经验和挑战，来建立在这一资源目录的基础上。它特别强调了强大的指导关系的重要性，以满足进行TRS研究的独特挑战，当政策和产品环境快速变化，主题往往是两极分化。7评注描述了受训者在TRS面临的专业挑战，并包括在作出知情决定和解决这些挑战方面的一些辅导者和受训者的方法。示例场景可能会帮助未来的辅导者，他们的导师更了解TRS中不断发展的挑战，并更好地准备应对这些挑战。
Tobacco regulatory science (TRS) is the scientific discipline that supports the evaluation of the risks and benefits of tobacco regulatory decisions and provides a robust scientific foundation for regulatory policies. 1 TRS encompasses many disciplines including population science, toxicity, tobacco control policy, pharmacology, product science, and marketing and communications, among others. 2, 3 The development and evaluation of TRS training programs have been a centerpiece of research funded by the US Food and Drug Administration Center for Tobacco Products (FDA CTP) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) since 2013, particularly through the Tobacco Centers of Regulatory Science (TCORS), the Center for Evaluation and Coordination of Training and Research in Tobacco Regulatory Science (CECTR), and the Center for Coordination of Analytics, Science, Enhancement, and Logistics in Tobacco Regulatory Science (CASEL). These efforts launched the field of TRS and created a need for new programs to address the unique needs of TRS trainees and their mentors, including training and mentorship programs coordinated for all FDA CTP-funded TRS grantees. To support the professional development of TRS scientists, investigators engaged in the TCORS collaborated initially with CECTR, and now CASEL, on a series of projects to inform TRS training and mentorship. First, Wipfli and colleagues 4 outlined TRS-specific domains and competencies characterizing content knowledge and skill levels needed to succeed in the field. Russo and colleagues 5 then conducted in-depth interviews with senior and early career scientists to identify characteristics of TRS that make it distinct from other research areas and described the difficulties of mentorship in this field. Di Frances and colleagues 6 built on these prior studies by developing, implementing, and evaluating a novel TRS mentor training program.The purpose of this commentary is to build on this catalog of resources by highlighting TRS-specific experiences and challenges that have emerged for trainees, pre-and post-doctoral fellows, and new and early-stage investigators (hereafter collectively referred to as mentees) in the first decade of TRS-funded training through the Tobacco Regulatory Science Program (TRSP) at NIH. It specifically highlights the importance of strong mentoring relationships to meet the unique challenges of conducting TRS research when policies and product landscapes are rapidly changing and topics are often polarizing. 7 The commentary describes professional challenges faced by mentees in TRS and includes some mentor and mentee approaches in making informed decisions and problem-solving those challenges. The example scenarios may help future mentees, and their mentors be more aware of evolving challenges in TRS and be more prepared to address them.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
4.7
作者：
Di Frances, Christy D.;Childs, Ellen;Benjamin, Emelia J.
通讯作者：
Benjamin, Emelia J.
影响因子：
2.6
作者：
Hussain SF;Vogel AL;Faupel-Badger JM;Ho L;Akacem LD;Balakrishnan K;Geiger R;Gopal-Srivastava R;Haynes B;Hodges MG;Isler T;Mathé EA;Misquitta L;Sharma KR;Sid E;Zigterman JL;Burgoon PW
通讯作者：
Burgoon PW
影响因子：
6.8
作者：
Wang, Jie;Cheng, Grand H. -L.;Leung, Kwok
通讯作者：
Leung, Kwok
影响因子：
16.6
作者：
AlShebli, Bedoor K.;Rahwan, Talal;Woon, Wei Lee
通讯作者：
Woon, Wei Lee
影响因子：
--
作者：
Backinger, Cathy L;Meissner, Helen I;Ashley, David L
通讯作者：
Ashley, David L