Decision analysis and Bayesian methods in clinical trials.

Decision analysis and Bayesian methods in clinical trials.
复制标题

临床试验中的决策分析和贝叶斯方法。

DOI:
10.1007/978-1-4615-2009-2_7
复制
发表时间:
1995
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Berry,DA
Berry,DA
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Berry,DA

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

The standard statistical approach to designing and analyzing clinical trials is frequentist. A purpose of this chapter is to describe a Bayesian approach as an alternative, or perhaps as a supplement. The two approaches have focuses so different that they can be viewed as distinct disciplines. And yet both deal with empirical evidence and both use probability, so the distinction is poorly understood by nonstatisticians. The distinction is further blurred when frequentists and Bayesians act and think alike — which they are wont to do, despite ‘anti’ rhetoric coming from both sides. Both approaches have good characteristics. The most important advantage of the Bayesian approach is attitude, which is consistent with the scientific method.
统计推断中停止规则的相关性
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4613-8768-8_5
发表时间: 1988
期刊: Controlled clinical trials
影响因子: --
作者:
J. Berger;D. Berry
通讯作者: D. Berry
DOI: 10.1056/nejm199104183241614
发表时间: 1991
期刊: The New England journal of medicine
影响因子: --
作者:
R. Souhami;S. Spiro;M. Cullen
通讯作者: M. Cullen
DOI: 10.1080/00031305.1987.10475458
发表时间: 1987
期刊: The American Statistician
影响因子: --
作者:
D. Berry
通讯作者: D. Berry
通过置信度曲线方法进行 MeW 分析:证据的统计综合
DOI: 10.1080/00401706.1993.10485067
发表时间: 1993
期刊: Technometrics
影响因子: 2.5
作者:
R. Lenth
通讯作者: R. Lenth
DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780140405
发表时间: 1995-02-28
影响因子: 2
作者:
ROSNER, GL;BERRY, DA
通讯作者: BERRY, DA