An evidence mapping of systematic reviews and meta-analysis on traditional Chinese medicine for ulcerative colitis.
An evidence mapping of systematic reviews and meta-analysis on traditional Chinese medicine for ulcerative colitis.
复制标题
中医药治疗溃疡性结肠炎的系统评价和荟萃分析的证据图谱
DOI：
10.1186/s12906-021-03387-y
复制
发表时间：
2021-09-13
影响因子：
3.9
通讯作者：
Liu ZL
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Sun YX;Wang X;Liao X;Guo J;Hou WB;Wang X;Liu JP;Liu ZL
BackgroundTraditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) has been a proposed treatment option for ulcerative colitis (UC), however it has been difficult to understand the breadth and depth of evidence as various Chinese medicine therapies may produce effects differently. The aim of this evidence mapping is to visually understand the available evidence in the use of TCM in the treatment of UC, and to identify gaps in evidence to inform priorities of future research.MethodsA systematic electronic literature search of six databases were performed to identify systematic reviews (SRs) on different Chinese medicine therapies in the treatment in UC. Methodological quality of the included SRs was assessed using AMSTAR 2.ResultsThe mapping was based on 73 SRs, which included nine interventions that met eligibility criteria. The quality of the included SRs was very low. The diseases stages of patients with UC varied greatly, from active to remission, to non-acute outbreak, to not reported. The results mostly favored the method of intervention. Oral administration combined with enema was the most widely used route of administration in secondary research.ConclusionBased on the current evidence, the treatment of UC with TCM can only be recommended cautiously. A majority of included SRs did not report the location of the disease, the disease classification, and the route of administration of the intervention. Further research is needed on the effectiveness of Chinese medicine alone in the treatment of UC. The effectiveness of combined Chinese and conventional medicine combined with different routes of administration cannot be confirmed. Attention should be paid to the methodological quality of the systematic review. Unifies the outcome indicators used in the evaluation of effectiveness.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
4.9
作者：
Bernstein, Charles N.;Fried, Michael;Watermeyer, Gillian
通讯作者：
Watermeyer, Gillian
影响因子：
1.6
作者：
Fan, Yuling;Yi, Wen;Feng, Zhitao
通讯作者：
Feng, Zhitao
DOI：
10.1080/09205063.2020.1864083
发表时间：
2020-12-20
影响因子：
3.6
作者：
Hu, Qingxi;Shen, Zhipeng;Ramalingam, Murugan
通讯作者：
Ramalingam, Murugan
影响因子：
3.7
作者：
Haug U;Engel S;Verheyen F;Linder R
通讯作者：
Linder R
DOI：
10.1056/nejmra0804647
发表时间：
2009-11-19
期刊：
The New England journal of medicine
影响因子：
--
作者：
Abraham C;Cho JH
通讯作者：
Cho JH