How task errors affect subsequent behavior: Evidence from distributional analyses of task-switching effects
How task errors affect subsequent behavior: Evidence from distributional analyses of task-switching effects
复制标题
任务错误如何影响后续行为：任务切换效应分布分析的证据
DOI：
10.3758/mc.36.5.979
复制
发表时间：
2008
影响因子：
2.4
通讯作者：
R. Hübner
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Steinhauser;R. Hübner
任务转换的转换成本通常被认为反映了任务相关联想的加强。最近，我们提供的证据表明，犯错误会导致错误任务的强化（Steinhauser & h<e:1> bner, 2006）。在本研究中，我们报告了误差诱导控制如何补偿误差强化的影响。我们假设，尽管错误检测不能阻止错误被强化，但它启动了抑制错误在后续试验中强化的负面后果的过程。由于已知误差诱导控制是缓慢运行的，我们预测补偿效应应该只在缓慢响应中观察到。在三个任务转换实验中，这些预测得到了分布分析的证实。研究结果扩展了我们对程序性学习和执行控制之间相互作用的理解。
Switch costs in task switching are often assumed to reflect the strengthening of task-related associations. Recently, we provided evidence that committing an error leads to the strengthening of the wrong task (Steinhauser & Hübner, 2006). In the present study, we report how error-induced control compensates for the effects of error strengthening. We hypothesized that, although error detection cannot prevent an error from being strengthened, it initiates processes that suppress the negative consequences of error strengthening on subsequent trials. Because error-induced control is known to operate slowly, we predicted that a compensatory effect should be observable only for slow responses. In three task-switching experiments, these predictions were confirmed by distributional analyses. The results extend our understanding of the interplay between procedural learning and executive control.
影响因子：
5.4
作者：
KORNBLUM, S;HASBROUCQ, T;OSMAN, A
通讯作者：
OSMAN, A
DOI：
10.1037/0096-1523.14.3.331
发表时间：
1988-08-01
影响因子：
2.1
作者：
GRATTON, G;COLES, MGH;DONCHIN, E
通讯作者：
DONCHIN, E