Cognitive behavioral therapy in anxiety disorders: current state of the evidence

Cognitive behavioral therapy in anxiety disorders: current state of the evidence
复制标题

焦虑症的认知行为疗法:证据现状

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2011
影响因子:
8.3
通讯作者:
Christian Otte
Christian Otte
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Christian Otte

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

大量的研究已经检查了认知行为疗法(CBT)对成人焦虑症的疗效和有效性。近年来,已经进行了几项荟萃分析,以定量审查CBT治疗焦虑症的证据,每项研究都使用不同的纳入标准,例如使用控制条件或研究环境类型。本文旨在总结和讨论CBT治疗惊恐障碍、广泛性焦虑障碍、社交焦虑障碍、强迫症和创伤后应激障碍的证据现状。总体而言,CBT在随机对照试验中表现出有效性,在治疗成人焦虑症的自然环境中表现出有效性。然而,由于方法问题,影响的程度目前难以估计。总之,CBT在治疗焦虑症方面似乎既有效又有效,但需要更多高质量的研究来更好地估计效果的大小。
A plethora of studies have examined the efficacy and effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for adult anxiety disorders. In recent years, several meta-analyses have been conducted to quantitatively review the evidence of CBT for anxiety disorders, each using different inclusion criteria for studies, such as use of control conditions or type of study environment. This review aims to summarize and to discuss the current state of the evidence regarding CBT treatment for panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, social anxiety disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder. Overall, CBT demonstrates both efficacy in randomized controlled trials and effectiveness in naturalistic settings in the treatment of adult anxiety disorders. However, due to methodological issues, the magnitude of effect is currently difficult to estimate. In conclusion, CBT appears to be both efficacious and effective in the treatment of anxiety disorders, but more high-quality studies are needed to better estimate the magnitude of the effect.
比较心理治疗与药物治疗的荟萃分析存在缺陷。
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.8.1204
发表时间: 2000
期刊: The American journal of psychiatry.
影响因子: --
作者:
Klein,DF
通讯作者: Klein,DF
DOI: 10.1037/a0016032
发表时间: 2009-08
影响因子: 5.9
作者:
Stewart RE;Chambless DL
通讯作者: Chambless DL