Different Groups, Different Motives
Different Groups, Different Motives
复制标题
不同群体，不同动机
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2012
影响因子：
4
通讯作者：
V. Vignoles
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Easterbrook;V. Vignoles
众所周知，社会认同具有广泛的影响，但理论家们对其潜在动机意见不一。将动机认同建构理论与最新的社会认同研究相结合，预测了两种类型的群体认同的动机：人际网络和社会类别。在一项对268名大学新生的社会认同过程的五波纵向研究中，多水平分析表明，参与身份设定过程的动机-自尊、归属感和效能感-显著预测个人内部对室友(人际网络群体)认同的变化，而参与身份定义过程的动机-意义、自尊和独特性-显著预测个人内部对宿舍(一种抽象的社会类别)认同的变化。本文讨论了对认同动机和社会认同研究的启示。
Social identification is known to have wide-reaching implications, but theorists disagree about the underlying motives. Integrating motivated identity construction theory with recent social identity research, the authors predicted which motives underlie identification with two types of groups: interpersonal networks and social categories. In a five-wave longitudinal study of social identity processes among 268 new university residents, multilevel analyses showed that motives involved in identity enactment processes—self-esteem, belonging, and efficacy—significantly predicted within-person changes in identification with flatmates (an interpersonal network group), whereas motives involved in identity definition processes—meaning, self-esteem, and distinctiveness—significantly predicted within-person changes in identification with halls of residence (an abstract social category). This article discusses implications for research into identity motives and social identity.
自发地使用群体类型作为记忆的组织原则。
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
Sherman,StevenJ;Castelli,Luigi;Hamilton,DavidL
通讯作者：
Hamilton,DavidL
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
Lickel, B;Hamilton, DL;Uhles, AN
通讯作者：
Uhles, AN