Evaluating 17 methods incorporating biological function with GWAS summary statistics to accelerate discovery demonstrates a tradeoff between high sensitivity and high positive predictive value.
Evaluating 17 methods incorporating biological function with GWAS summary statistics to accelerate discovery demonstrates a tradeoff between high sensitivity and high positive predictive value.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1038/s42003-023-05413-w
复制
发表时间:
2023-11-24
影响因子:
5.9
通讯作者:
Johnson, Eric O.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Moore, Amy;Marks, Jesse A.;Quach, Bryan C.;Guo, Yuelong;Bierut, Laura J.;Gaddis, Nathan C.;Hancock, Dana B.;Page, Grier P.;Johnson, Eric O.
Where sufficiently large genome-wide association study (GWAS) samples are not currently available or feasible, methods that leverage increasing knowledge of the biological function of variants may illuminate discoveries without increasing sample size. We comprehensively evaluated 17 functional weighting methods for identifying novel associations. We assessed the performance of these methods using published results from multiple GWAS waves across each of five complex traits. Although no method achieved both high sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) for any trait, a subset of methods utilizing pleiotropy and expression quantitative trait loci nominated variants with high PPV (>75%) for multiple traits. Application of functionally weighting methods to enhance GWAS power for locus discovery is unlikely to circumvent the need for larger sample sizes in truly underpowered GWAS, but these results suggest that applying functional weighting to GWAS can accurately nominate additional novel loci from available samples for follow-up studies. Evaluation of 17 published functional weighting methods for improving GWAS statistical power demonstrates a tradeoff between high sensitivity and high positive predictive value.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
4
作者:
Bonevski B;Randell M;Paul C;Chapman K;Twyman L;Bryant J;Brozek I;Hughes C
通讯作者:
Hughes C
影响因子:
6.2
作者:
Autism Spectrum Disorders Working Group of The Psychiatric Genomics Consortium
通讯作者:
Autism Spectrum Disorders Working Group of The Psychiatric Genomics Consortium
影响因子:
64.8
作者:
GTEx Consortium;Laboratory, Data Analysis &Coordinating Center (LDACC)—Analysis Working Group;Statistical Methods groups—Analysis Working Group;Enhancing GTEx (eGTEx) groups;NIH Common Fund;NIH/NCI;NIH/NHGRI;NIH/NIMH;NIH/NIDA;Biospecimen Collection Source Site—NDRI;Biospecimen Collection Source Site—RPCI;Biospecimen Core Resource—VARI;Brain Bank Repository—University of Miami Brain Endowment Bank;Leidos Biomedical—Project Management;ELSI Study;Genome Browser Data Integration &Visualization—EBI;Genome Browser Data Integration &Visualization—UCSC Genomics Institute, University of California Santa Cruz;Lead analysts:;Laboratory, Data Analysis &Coordinating Center (LDACC):;NIH program management:;Biospecimen collection:;Pathology:;eQTL manuscript working group:;Battle A;Brown CD;Engelhardt BE;Montgomery SB
通讯作者:
Montgomery SB
影响因子:
30.8
作者:
Atkinson EG;Maihofer AX;Kanai M;Martin AR;Karczewski KJ;Santoro ML;Ulirsch JC;Kamatani Y;Okada Y;Finucane HK;Koenen KC;Nievergelt CM;Daly MJ;Neale BM
通讯作者:
Neale BM
影响因子:
14.9
作者:
Frankish A;Diekhans M;Ferreira AM;Johnson R;Jungreis I;Loveland J;Mudge JM;Sisu C;Wright J;Armstrong J;Barnes I;Berry A;Bignell A;Carbonell Sala S;Chrast J;Cunningham F;Di Domenico T;Donaldson S;Fiddes IT;García Girón C;Gonzalez JM;Grego T;Hardy M;Hourlier T;Hunt T;Izuogu OG;Lagarde J;Martin FJ;Martínez L;Mohanan S;Muir P;Navarro FCP;Parker A;Pei B;Pozo F;Ruffier M;Schmitt BM;Stapleton E;Suner MM;Sycheva I;Uszczynska-Ratajczak B;Xu J;Yates A;Zerbino D;Zhang Y;Aken B;Choudhary JS;Gerstein M;Guigó R;Hubbard TJP;Kellis M;Paten B;Reymond A;Tress ML;Flicek P
通讯作者:
Flicek P