Under what conditions do young children have difficulty inhibiting manual actions?
Under what conditions do young children have difficulty inhibiting manual actions?
复制标题
幼儿在什么情况下难以抑制手动动作？
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2007
影响因子：
4
通讯作者：
Kevin J. Riggs
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Andrew Simpson;Kevin J. Riggs
了解反应如何变得更有效对于理解日常行为中何时需要抑制控制至关重要。作者调查了手动操作在执行/不执行任务中变得更有效的条件。在进行试验时，孩子们必须打开贴有贴纸的盒子；在不进行试验时，孩子们必须关闭空着的盒子。在实验 1（n = 40，平均年龄 = 3.6 岁）中，作者获得了与需要抑制控制的任务一致的证据。实验 2（n = 40，平均年龄 = 3.7 岁）的结果表明，打开盒子具有优势，因为 (a) 打开是与盒子相关的习惯性动作，(b) 孩子们计划在任务试验中打开盒子。实验 3（n = 96，平均年龄 = 3.5 岁）表明，即使是空盒子也会引发相同的错误，并且延迟响应会减少错误，即使延迟发生在指示正确响应的提示之前（与规则反射帐户相反）。由于延迟发生在盒子呈现之后，因此性能与临时激活帐户一致。延迟训练可能对抑制力较弱的儿童有益。
Understanding how responses become prepotent is essential for understanding when inhibitory control is needed in everyday behavior. The authors investigated the conditions under which manual actions became prepotent in a go/no-go task. Children had to open boxes that contained stickers on go trials and leave shut boxes that were empty on no-go trials. In Experiment 1 (n = 40, mean age = 3.6 years), the authors obtained evidence consistent with this task requiring inhibitory control. Results of Experiment 2 (n = 40, mean age = 3.7 years) suggested that box opening was prepotent because (a) opening is the habitual action associated with boxes and (b) children planned to open boxes on go trials of the task. Experiment 3 (n = 96, mean age = 3.5 years) showed that even empty boxes elicited the same errors and that delaying responding reduced errors even though the delay occurred before the cue that indicated the correct response (contrary to a rule reflection account). Because the delay occurred after box presentation, performance was consistent with a transient activation account. Delay training might benefit children with weak inhibition.
DOI：
10.1037/0096-1523.30.3.538
发表时间：
2004-06-01
影响因子：
2.1
作者：
Godijn, R;Theeuwes, J
通讯作者：
Theeuwes, J
影响因子：
4
作者：
Diamond, A;Kirkham, N;Amso, D
通讯作者：
Amso, D