Potential for Precision Medicine in Methadone Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder.
Potential for Precision Medicine in Methadone Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder.
复制标题
美沙酮治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的精准医学潜力。
DOI:
10.1097/adm.0000000000000619
复制
发表时间:
2020
影响因子:
5.5
通讯作者:
Saxon,AndrewJ
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Saxon,AndrewJ
T he paper by McCarthy et al.(2020) opens a potential new opportunity to apply precision medicine to the use of methadone to treat opioid use disorder (OUD). McCarthy and colleagues analyzed data from 1700 blood specimens provided by patients receiving methadone maintenance treatment for OUD and sent to a single clinical laboratory for assays of serum methadone concentrations. This analysis found that the ratio of serum methadone concentration to the concentration of its inactive metabolite ethylidine-dimethyl-diphenypyrrolidine (EDDP) could be used to divide the samples into 4 categories closely corresponding to the 4 categories of metabolic activity classically defined in the pharmacokinetic literature to describe the human variation in metabolism of a given pharmacologic compound: poor metabolizers (called ultra-slow metabolizers in the paper), intermediate metabolizers, extensive metabolizers, and ultra-rapid metabolizers. The analysis further showed significant associations between these categories and the methadone serum concentration peak to trough ratio which already has recognized clinical utility and is obtained when patients demonstrate a poor response to methadone, particularly when patients complain of pre-dose withdrawal symptoms no matter how high the daily dosage goes. Patients with this clinical profile and a peak to trough ratio greater than 2 are presumed to be extensive or ultra-rapid metabolizers in whom methadone has a short half-life, and who will therefore require split dosing, having their total daily dosage divided into 2 separate administrations, to keep the trough serum level above the range at which withdrawal symptoms supervene. For background and as briefly noted by McCarthy et al, the metabolism of methadone is quite complex and not yet fully elucidated. Current understanding indicates that multiple CYP 450 enzyme systems, including CYP3A4, CYP2B6, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP2C9, and CYP2C8, likely contribute to N-demethylation of methadone to EDDP, and so metabolic pathways might be different across different individuals (Volpe et al., 2018). CYP 450 enzyme activities are determined largely by genetics with some contribution by environmental effects, for example enzyme inhibition or induction by various substrates. The science of understanding genetic effects on methadone metabolism remains in its infancy, but preliminary data suggest that polymorphisms in CYP2B6 may indeed contribute to rate of metabolism, whereas polymorphisms in CYP2D6 appear not to do so (Victorri-Vigneau et al., 2019). When one considers the plethora of enzymes involved, the number of potential polymorphisms that could contribute to alterations in methadone metabolism, and the potential interactions between different genetic influences in a single individual, it seems quite apparent that clinically useful genetic testing to place patients receiving methadone in 1 of 4 metabolizer groups described above is not on the current horizon. Thus, a simpler biomarker that could serve a similar function, such as the methadone/EDDP ratio propounded by McCarthy et al, holds considerable allure.What clinical advantages might such a biomarker offer? McCarthy et al point out that, to the best of our current awareness, extensive and ultra-rapid metabolizers make up at most about 10% of the population of individuals receiving methadone treatment for OUD. Thus, during ongoing routine clinical care the vast majority of patients can be well managed without obtaining serum methadone levels or any other biomarker and simply using clinical judgment to determine a therapeutic methadone dosage when withdrawal signs …
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
4.3
作者:
Dina G. Fischer;William J. Hubbard;Hillel S. Koren
通讯作者:
Hillel S. Koren
DOI:
--
发表时间:
1983
期刊:
Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)
影响因子:
--
作者:
Wright,SC;Bonavida,B
通讯作者:
Bonavida,B
DOI:
--
发表时间:
1981
期刊:
International Journal of Immunopharmacology
影响因子:
--
作者:
A. Uchida;M. Micksche
通讯作者:
M. Micksche
影响因子:
6.4
作者:
A. Uchida;M. Micksche
通讯作者:
M. Micksche
DOI:
--
发表时间:
1982
期刊:
Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)
影响因子:
--
作者:
Wright,SC;Bonavida,B
通讯作者:
Bonavida,B