A Community-based Whole Life Carbon Assessment: Case study of a London estate community plan
A Community-based Whole Life Carbon Assessment: Case study of a London estate community plan
复制标题
基于社区的终身碳评估：伦敦房地产社区计划的案例研究
DOI：
10.1088/1742-6596/2600/15/152020
复制
发表时间：
2023
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Nava S
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Nava S
为了遵守英国2050年净零排放战略，在住宅区的再生方面，更多的注意力集中在以能源为中心的决策上。全生命周期碳评估（WLCA）是用于评估建筑项目在其生命周期内的总体二氧化碳当量（CO2e）排放量的方法。WLCA研究大多不被不同的利益相关者所理解，在制定再生情景时，在减少全球变暖潜势（GWP）影响方面效果较差。本文是一个更大的研究的一部分，基于多利益相关者的生命周期的可持续性评估框架，旨在进一步探讨改造是否可以优于现有的和新的建设方案，以降低GWP的影响，并打算检查使用WLCA的再生方案的发展。该研究包括一个单一的案例研究，采用共同设计研讨会，调查和WLCA实验。社区首选的再生方案是通过与社区成员和UCL设计师和研究人员团队的知识流动和共同设计研讨会开发的。不同再生方案（现有建筑、不同翻新方案和先前批准的重建方案）的WLCA已使用基于案头研究的数据、现场调查、建筑法规、改造案例研究和指南以及理事会先前批准的新建方案的规划文件进行。WLCA的结果支持目前的研究，有利于翻新方案的拆除和重建的遗产，并提出了一个理由，了解在设计开发的全球升温潜能值，以减少再生方案的全球升温潜能值的必要性。
In the attempt to adhere to the UK’s 2050 Net-Zero Strategy, more attention has been given to energy-centric decision-making over the regeneration of housing estates. Whole Life Carbon Assessment (WLCA) is the methodology used for the evaluation of the overall carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) emissions of building projects over their lifecycle. The WLCA studies are mostly not understood by different stakeholders and are less effective in reducing the Global Warming Potential (GWP) impacts in the development of regeneration scenarios. This paper is part of a larger study on a multistakeholder lifecycle-based sustainability assessment framework and aims to further explore whether retrofitting can outperform the existing and new build scenarios for lower GWP impacts, and intends to examine the use of WLCA for the development of a regeneration scenario. The research consists of a single-case case study employing co-design workshops, surveys, and WLCA experiments. The community’s preferred regeneration scenario has been developed through knowledge mobility and co-design workshops with the members of the community and a UCL team of designers and researchers. The WLCA of different regeneration scenarios (existing building, different refurbishment scenarios, and a previously approved redevelopment scheme) has been conducted using the data from desk-based research, site surveys, building regulations, retrofit case studies and guidelines, and the planning documents of the council’s previously approved new build scheme. The results of the WLCA support the current studies in favour of the refurbishment scenarios over the demolition and rebuilding of the estate, and make a case for the necessity of understanding the GWP in design development to reduce the GWP of regeneration scenarios.
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2019
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
Richard Twinn;K. Desai;Philip Box
通讯作者：
Philip Box
评估构建 LCA 的规范模型和基于现实的模型之间的差距
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2020
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
D. Vuarnoz;E. Hoxha;J. Nembrini;T. Jusselme;S. Cozza
通讯作者：
S. Cozza
现代主义住宅区的未来：未来城市致密化背景下的“替换与翻新”困境
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2019
期刊：
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
影响因子：
--
作者：
A. Tepavcevic
通讯作者：
A. Tepavcevic