STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration.
STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012799
复制
发表时间:
2016-11-14
期刊:
影响因子:
2.9
通讯作者:
Bossuyt PM
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Cohen JF;Korevaar DA;Altman DG;Bruns DE;Gatsonis CA;Hooft L;Irwig L;Levine D;Reitsma JB;de Vet HC;Bossuyt PM
Diagnostic accuracy studies are, like other clinical studies, at risk of bias due to shortcomings in design and conduct, and the results of a diagnostic accuracy study may not apply to other patient groups and settings. Readers of study reports need to be informed about study design and conduct, in sufficient detail to judge the trustworthiness and applicability of the study findings. The STARD statement (Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) was developed to improve the completeness and transparency of reports of diagnostic accuracy studies. STARD contains a list of essential items that can be used as a checklist, by authors, reviewers and other readers, to ensure that a report of a diagnostic accuracy study contains the necessary information. STARD was recently updated. All updated STARD materials, including the checklist, are available at http://www.equator-network.org/reporting-guidelines/stard. Here, we present the STARD 2015 explanation and elaboration document. Through commented examples of appropriate reporting, we clarify the rationale for each of the 30 items on the STARD 2015 checklist, and describe what is expected from authors in developing sufficiently informative study reports.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
4.1
作者:
Bochmann, Frank;Johnson, Zoe;Azuara-Blanco, Augusto
通讯作者:
Azuara-Blanco, Augusto
影响因子:
9.3
作者:
Bossuyt, PM;Reitsma, JB;de Vet, HCW
通讯作者:
de Vet, HCW
影响因子:
105.7
作者:
Collins, Michael G.;Teo, Edward;Coates, P. Toby
通讯作者:
Coates, P. Toby
影响因子:
120.7
作者:
Begg, C;Cho, M;Stroup, DF
通讯作者:
Stroup, DF
影响因子:
4.4
作者:
Attia, M;Zaoutis, T;Meier, F
通讯作者:
Meier, F