Exploring the transnational translation of ideas: German social work education in Palestine in the 1930s and 1940s

Exploring the transnational translation of ideas: German social work education in Palestine in the 1930s and 1940s
复制标题

探索思想的跨国转化:20世纪30年代和1940年代巴勒斯坦的德国社会工作教育

DOI:
10.1080/21931674.2016.1222759
复制
发表时间:
2016
期刊:
Transnational Social Review
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Stefan
Stefan
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Köngeter;Stefan

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

本文探讨了世纪上半叶社会工作中思想知识的跨国交流。借鉴知识的跨国翻译的概念,这里提出的研究揭示了知识和思想之间的相互作用,在20世纪30年代初带来的德国社会工作者难民巴勒斯坦,占主导地位的观念,价值观和犹太社区在该国的条件。个案研究遵循的努力,引入到巴勒斯坦的社会工作教育的德国模式,特别是领导德国犹太社会工作者Siddy Wronsky和其他合法化的方法,社会工作发展在魏玛德国在20世纪20年代的斗争。虽然在所研究的时期内,当地社会工作机构的系统最终出现了,但将德国社会工作方法有效引入巴勒斯坦的努力却不太成功。在劳工运动占主导地位的社会背景下,德国的社会工作方法未能获得合法性,而社会福利的概念则相反,这就是知识翻译到巴勒斯坦只取得部分成功的原因。
This article explores the transnational exchange of knowledge of ideas in social work in the first half of the twentieth century. Drawing upon the notion of transnational translation of knowledge, the study presented here sheds light on the interaction between the knowledge and ideas brought to Palestine in the early 1930s by German social worker refugees, and the dominant perceptions, values, and conditions of the Jewish community in that country. The case study follows the efforts to introduce a German model of social work education into Palestine and, particularly, the struggle of leading German-Jewish social worker Siddy Wronsky and others to legitimize the approach of social work developed in Weimar Germany in the 1920s. While a system of local social work institutions did eventually emerge during the period studied, the effort to effectively introduce the German social work approach into Palestine was less successful. The failure to gain legitimacy of the German approach to social work in a social context where the labor movement dominated with a contrasting notion of social welfare was the reason that the translation of knowledge to Palestine was only partially successful.
发展中国家和殖民地社会的志愿组织:20世纪30年代巴勒斯坦犹太社区的社会服务部
DOI: 10.1177/089976409102000405
发表时间: 1991
影响因子: 2.8
作者:
F. Loewenberg
通讯作者: F. Loewenberg
DOI: 10.1086/ahr.111.5.1441
发表时间: 2006
期刊: The American Historical Review
影响因子: --
作者:
C. Bayly;S. Beckert;M. Connelly;Isabel Hofmeyr;Wendy Kozol;P. Seed
通讯作者: P. Seed
哈达萨和犹太复国主义计划
DOI: 10.5860/choice.44-2837
发表时间: 2006
期刊: The Leo Baeck Institute Yearbook
影响因子: --
作者:
Erica B. Simmons
通讯作者: Erica B. Simmons
DOI: 10.1080/02615479.2010.491310
发表时间: 2011
影响因子: 1.8
作者:
K. Brown
通讯作者: K. Brown
女性与教育:Gertrud Bäumer zum Beispiel
DOI: 10.1016/0305-750x(88)90039-3
发表时间: 1997
期刊: Medical History
影响因子: 1.4
作者:
C. Hopf
通讯作者: C. Hopf