Introduction: Heritage-Outside-In
Introduction: Heritage-Outside-In
复制标题
简介：由外而内的遗产
DOI：
10.1080/13527258.2016.1184704
复制
发表时间：
2016
影响因子：
1.8
通讯作者：
Ashley S
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Ashley S
“遗产”是人们用来定义与过去观念相关的身份的一种社会想象。但人员、思想、想象力和技术的全球流动（Appadurai 1996; Urry 2007）正在挑战既定的群体/社区/国家身份以及构成遗产的主导体系和权力话语。本期特刊从遗产话语授权领域“之外”的角度，对遗产和身份的性质和重要性所面临的挑战提供了一系列见解（Smith 2006）。对我们来说重要的是权力关系，它构成了用于定义“内部”和“外部”位置性的不断变化的、有争议的和令人费解的差异假设（Hall 1999；Littler 2005）。我们将“遗产创造”视为与过去相关的文化生产过程，人们通过这个过程来理解他们的世界和他们在其中的位置，并在公共领域战略性地维护他们的声音。遗产不被解释为物体、建筑物或地点甚至无形实践所拥有的内在品质，而是所有人类为赋予其生活意义而对过去进行的意义或评价。遗产作为“创造”是一种表演行为；个人和社区自我意识的积极和情感表达（Robertson 2012）。被视为一种声音行为的表演性遗产意味着一种更具政治性的意见表达、被倾听，并以在民主化世界建设中得到认可和重视的方式记录该意见。将遗产表述为“世界创造”借鉴了阿伦特（Arendt，1958）的观点，阿伦特热情地主张公共领域有能力将陌生人聚集在一起，调动相似性和差异性，以应对不同社区中人类生活的复杂性和不确定性（Simon 和 Ashley，2010）。在此过程中，人们将寻求保留以他们在社会、经济和政治上控制的方式创造世界（选择、表达和改变其根深蒂固的身份）的能力。通过创造遗产，“外部”或少数群体的个人和群体代表了他们自己的文化差异，但也阐明了他们与家乡/地方/国家的集体政体的关系（Shryock 2004）。许多关于遗产和边缘化或少数群体的国际学术研究将这些群体定位为主流机构社会包容活动的“受益者”（Lynch 和 Alberti 2010）。本期特刊以“局外人”的视角，审视由民族、种族和其他（亚）文化群体和个人驱动的独立遗产创造行动和项目。这里提出的研究主题旨在将遗产创造活动理解为全球化和去殖民化中的现象，与边缘化或移民群体的身份和主体性谈判密切相关，从而受到当地社会、文化和政治生态的影响。
‘Heritage’is one social imaginary used by people to define identity in relation to ideas about the past. But global flows of people, ideas, imaginations and technologies (Appadurai 1996; Urry 2007) are challenging established group/community/national identities and the dominating systems and discourses of power that constitute heritage. This special issue offers a range of insights about those challenges to the nature and importance of heritage and identities from the perspectives of those ‘outside’the authorised realm of heritage discourse (Smith 2006). Important to us are the power relations that constitute the shifting, contested and puzzling assumptions of difference used to define ‘inside’and ‘outside’positionality (Hall 1999; Littler 2005).We see ‘heritage-making’as a process of cultural production in relation to the past by which people make sense of their world and their place within it, as well as strategically assert their voices in the public sphere. Heritage is interpreted not as an intrinsic quality possessed by objects, buildings or places or even intangible practices, but a signification or valuation of the past undertaken by all humans to give meaning to their lives. Heritage as ‘making’is a performative act; an active and affective expression of individual and community senses of self (Robertson 2012). Performative heritage seen as an act of voice infers a more political expressing of opinion, being heard, and registering that opinion in a way that is recognised and valued in democratised world-making. Heritage expression as ‘world-making’draws on Arendt (1958) who passionately argued for a public realm with the power to gather strangers together, mobilising both semblance and difference in order to confront the complexities and uncertainties of human life in diverse communities (Simon and Ashley 2010). In this process, peoples will seek to retain the ability to make worlds (choose, express and change their rooted identities) in ways that they control socially, economically and politically. By making heritage,‘outside’or minority individuals and groups represent their own cultural difference, but also articulate their relationship to the collective polity in their home/place/nation (Shryock 2004). Much international academic research about heritage and marginalised or minority peoples situates such peoples as ‘beneficiaries’ of mainstream institutional social inclusion activities (Lynch and Alberti 2010). This special issue takes the ‘outsider’perspective, inspecting independent heritage-making actions and projects driven by ethnic, racial and other (sub) cultural groups and individuals. The research topics presented here aim to understand heritage-making activities as phenomena within globalisation and de-colonialisation, bound up in the negotiation of identities and subjectivities by marginalised or migratory peoples, thus shaped by the social, cultural and political ecologies of signification on the ground.
登录
查看更多内容
展望“批判遗产研究”的未来：回顾过去，展望未来
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2013
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
A. Witcomb;K. Buckley
通讯作者：
K. Buckley
谁的遗产？ 颠覆“遗产”，重新想象后国家
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2004
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
Stuart Hall
通讯作者：
Stuart Hall
1. 其他意识/自我意识：对文化亲密性和大众调解的初步思考
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2004
期刊：
Off Stage/On Display
影响因子：
--
作者：
A. Shryock
通讯作者：
A. Shryock
影响因子：
2.1
作者：
Lynch, Bernadette;Alberti, Samuel
通讯作者：
Alberti, Samuel
公共形成的遗产和实践
影响因子：
1.8
作者：
R. Simon;S. Ashley
通讯作者：
S. Ashley