Association of Preadmission Statin Use and Mortality in Critically Ill Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies.
Association of Preadmission Statin Use and Mortality in Critically Ill Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies.
复制标题
危重患者入院前他汀类药物使用与死亡率的关联:队列研究的荟萃分析
DOI:
10.3389/fmed.2021.656694
复制
发表时间:
2021
影响因子:
3.9
通讯作者:
Sun Y
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Yu SS;Jin J;Yao RQ;Wang BL;Hu LY;Wu GS;Sun Y
Background: A large number of studies have been conducted to determine whether there is an association between preadmission statin use and improvement in outcomes following critical illness, but the conclusions are quite inconsistent. Therefore, this meta-analysis aims to include the present relevant PSM researches to examine the association of preadmission use of statins with the mortality of critically ill patients. Methods: The PubMed, Web of Science, Embase electronic databases, and printed resources were searched for English articles published before March 6, 2020 on the association between preadmission statin use and mortality in critically ill patients. The included articles were analyzed in RevMan 5.3. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to conduct quality evaluation, and random/fixed effects modeling was used to calculate the pooled ORs and 95% CIs. We also conducted subgroup analysis by outcome indicators (30-, 90-day, hospital mortality). Results: All six PSM observational studies were assessed as having a low risk of bias according to the NOS. For primary outcome—overall mortality, the pooled OR (preadmission statins use vs. no use) across the six included studies was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.76–0.97; P = 0.02). For secondary outcome—use of mechanical ventilation, the pooled OR was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.91–0.97; P = 0.0005). The corresponding pooled ORs were 0.67 (95% CI, 0.43–1.05; P = 0.08), 0.91 (95% CI, 0.83–1.01; P = 0.07), and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.83–0.89; P < 0.00001) for 30-, 90-day, and hospital mortality, respectively. Conclusions: Preadmission statin use is associated with beneficial outcomes in critical ill patients, indicating a lower short-term mortality, less use of mechanical ventilation, and an improvement in hospital survival. Further high-quality original studies or more scientific methods are needed to draw a definitive conclusion.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.1186/cc13845
发表时间:
2014-04-28
期刊:
Critical care (London, England)
影响因子:
--
作者:
Bruyere R;Vigneron C;Prin S;Pechinot A;Quenot JP;Aho S;Papazian L;Charles PE
通讯作者:
Charles PE
DOI:
10.1164/rccm.201209-1718oc
发表时间:
2013-04-01
影响因子:
24.7
作者:
Kruger, Peter;Bailey, Michael;Venkatesh, Bala
通讯作者:
Venkatesh, Bala
影响因子:
9.8
作者:
Lee, M. G.;Lee, C. -C.;Chen, Y. -M.
通讯作者:
Chen, Y. -M.
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
Ma Y;Wen X;Peng J;Lu Y;Guo Z;Lu J
通讯作者:
Lu J
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
López-Cortés LE;Gálvez-Acebal J;Del Toro MD;Velasco C;de Cueto M;Caballero FJ;Muniain MA;Pascual A;Rodríguez-Baño J
通讯作者:
Rodríguez-Baño J