Scientific visualisations and aesthetic grounds for trust

Scientific visualisations and aesthetic grounds for trust
复制标题

科学的可视化和信任的美学基础

DOI:
10.1007/s10676-008-9159-5
复制
发表时间:
2008
影响因子:
3.6
通讯作者:
Carusi A
Carusi A
中科院分区:
管理学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Carusi A

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

世纪中后期物理学中盛行的协作式“大科学”方法在生命科学中变得越来越普遍。这些合作通常以计算为媒介,挑战研究人员的信任实践。关注可视化,往往是这种形式的科学实践的核心,本文提出,这些可视化的美学方面本身就是一种确保信任的方式。康德在《第三批判》中对审美判断的叙述是为了表明想象力的形象建构能力和共同感觉,这两者都是审美经验的组成部分,在建立和维持这些科学形式的共同体方面发挥着重要作用。康德的理论表明,科学可视化的美学吸引力并不孤立于可视化的其他两个维度:认知-认识,美学-风格和人际维度,并且凭借这些相互关系,可视化有助于建立相互主体共享的协议框架,这是信任的基础。
The collaborative ‹Big Science’ approach prevalent in physics during the mid- and late-20th century is becoming more common in the life sciences. Often computationally mediated, these collaborations challenge researchers’ trust practices. Focusing on the visualisations that are often at the heart of this form of scientific practice, the paper proposes that the aesthetic aspects of these visualisations are themselves a way of securing trust. Kant’s account of aesthetic judgements in the ThirdCritiqueis drawn upon in order to show that the image-building capability of imagination, and thesensus communis, both of which are integral parts of aesthetic experience, play an important role in building and sustaining community in these forms of science. Kant’s theory shows that the aesthetic appeal of scientific visualisations is not isolated from two other dimensions of the visualisations: the cognitive-epistemic, aesthetic-stylistic and interpersonal dimensions, and that in virtue of these inter-relationships, visualisations contribute to building up the intersubjectively shared framework of agreement which is basic for trust.
在科学上信任他人:先验的还是经验的依据?
DOI: 10.1016/s0039-3681(02)00006-7
发表时间: 2002
影响因子: 1
作者:
Elizabeth Fricker
通讯作者: Elizabeth Fricker
解析星云:代表 M51 的科学与艺术
DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2007.03.001
发表时间: 2007
影响因子: 1
作者:
Elizabeth A. Kessler
通讯作者: Elizabeth A. Kessler
想象的力量:视觉描述和社会关系
DOI: 10.2307/1320535
发表时间: 1988
期刊: Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology
影响因子: --
作者:
M. Emme;G. Fyfe;J. Law
通讯作者: J. Law
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226231785.001.0001
发表时间: 1982
影响因子: 2.1
作者:
H. Arendt;Ronald S. Beiner
通讯作者: Ronald S. Beiner