The Impact of the CYP2D6 "Enhancer" Single Nucleotide Polymorphism on CYP2D6 Activity.
The Impact of the CYP2D6 "Enhancer" Single Nucleotide Polymorphism on CYP2D6 Activity.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1002/cpt.2469
复制
发表时间:
2022-03
影响因子:
6.7
通讯作者:
Gaedigk A
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Dinh JC;Boone EC;Staggs VS;Pearce RE;Wang WY;Gaedigk R;Leeder JS;Gaedigk A
rs5758550 has been associated with enhanced transcription and suggested to be a useful marker of CYP2D6 activity. As there are limited and inconsistent data regarding the utility of this distant “enhancer” single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), our goal was to further assess the impact of rs5758550 on CYP2D6 activity toward two probe substrates, atomoxetine (ATX) and dextromethorphan (DM), using in vivo urinary metabolite (DM; n=188) and pharmacokinetic (ATX; n=70) and in vitro metabolite formation (ATX and DM; n=166) data. All subjects and tissues were extensively genotyped, the “enhancer” SNP phased with established CYP2D6 haplotypes either computationally or experimentally, and the impact on CYP2D6 activity investigated using several linear models of varying complexity to determine the proportion of variability in CYP2D6 activity captured by each model. For all datasets and models, the “enhancer” SNP had no or only a modest impact on CYP2D6 activity prediction. An increased effect, when present, was more pronounced for ATX than DM suggesting potential substate-dependency. In addition, CYP2D6*2 alleles with the “enhancer” SNP were associated with modestly higher metabolite formation rates in vitro, but not in vivo; no effect was detected for CYP2D6*1 alleles with “enhancer” SNP. In summary, it remains inconclusive whether the small effects detected in this investigation are indeed caused by the “enhancer” SNP or are rather due to its incomplete linkage with other variants within the gene. Taken together, there does not appear to be sufficient evidence to warrant the “enhancer” SNP be included in clinical CYP2D6 pharmacogenetic testing.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
6.7
作者:
Goetz MP;Sangkuhl K;Guchelaar HJ;Schwab M;Province M;Whirl-Carrillo M;Symmans WF;McLeod HL;Ratain MJ;Zembutsu H;Gaedigk A;van Schaik RH;Ingle JN;Caudle KE;Klein TE
通讯作者:
Klein TE
影响因子:
6.7
作者:
Ning M;Duarte JD;Rubin LH;Jeong H
通讯作者:
Jeong H
影响因子:
6.7
作者:
Crews KR;Monte AA;Huddart R;Caudle KE;Kharasch ED;Gaedigk A;Dunnenberger HM;Leeder JS;Callaghan JT;Samer CF;Klein TE;Haidar CE;Van Driest SL;Ruano G;Sangkuhl K;Cavallari LH;Müller DJ;Prows CA;Nagy M;Somogyi AA;Skaar TC
通讯作者:
Skaar TC
影响因子:
6.7
作者:
Frederiksen T;Areberg J;Schmidt E;Bjerregaard Stage T;Brøsen K
通讯作者:
Brøsen K
影响因子:
2.9
作者:
Chládek, J;Zimová, G;Tuma, I
通讯作者:
Tuma, I