Does multi-way, long-range chromatin contact data advance 3D genome reconstruction?
Does multi-way, long-range chromatin contact data advance 3D genome reconstruction?
复制标题
DOI:
10.1186/s12859-023-05170-x
复制
发表时间:
2023-02-24
影响因子:
3
通讯作者:
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Methods for inferring the three-dimensional (3D) configuration of chromatin from conformation capture assays that provide strictly pairwise interactions, notably Hi-C, utilize the attendant contact matrix as input. More recent assays, in particular split-pool recognition of interactions by tag extension (SPRITE), capture multi-way interactions instead of solely pairwise contacts. These assays yield contacts that straddle appreciably greater genomic distances than Hi-C, in addition to instances of exceptionally high-order chromatin interaction. Such attributes are anticipated to be consequential with respect to 3D genome reconstruction, a task yet to be undertaken with multi-way contact data. However, performing such 3D reconstruction using distance-based reconstruction techniques requires framing multi-way contacts as (pairwise) distances. Comparing approaches for so doing, and assessing the resultant impact of long-range and multi-way contacts, are the objectives of this study. We obtained 3D reconstructions via multi-dimensional scaling under a variety of weighting schemes for mapping SPRITE multi-way contacts to pairwise distances. Resultant configurations were compared following Procrustes alignment and relationships were assessed between associated Procrustes root mean square errors and key features such as the extent of multi-way and/or long-range contacts. We found that these features had surprisingly limited influence on 3D reconstruction, a finding we attribute to their influence being diminished by the preponderance of pairwise contacts. Distance-based 3D genome reconstruction using SPRITE multi-way contact data is not appreciably affected by the weighting scheme used to convert multi-way interactions to pairwise distances.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
4.4
作者:
Cournac A;Marie-Nelly H;Marbouty M;Koszul R;Mozziconacci J
通讯作者:
Mozziconacci J
影响因子:
64.5
作者:
Quinodoz SA;Ollikainen N;Tabak B;Palla A;Schmidt JM;Detmar E;Lai MM;Shishkin AA;Bhat P;Takei Y;Trinh V;Aznauryan E;Russell P;Cheng C;Jovanovic M;Chow A;Cai L;McDonel P;Garber M;Guttman M
通讯作者:
Guttman M
影响因子:
3
作者:
Segal, Mark R.;Bengtsson, Henrik L.
通讯作者:
Bengtsson, Henrik L.
影响因子:
48
作者:
Ramani V;Deng X;Qiu R;Gunderson KL;Steemers FJ;Disteche CM;Noble WS;Duan Z;Shendure J
通讯作者:
Shendure J
DOI:
10.1126/science.aay3446
发表时间:
2021-02-26
期刊:
Science (New York, N.Y.)
影响因子:
--
作者:
Payne AC;Chiang ZD;Reginato PL;Mangiameli SM;Murray EM;Yao CC;Markoulaki S;Earl AS;Labade AS;Jaenisch R;Church GM;Boyden ES;Buenrostro JD;Chen F
通讯作者:
Chen F