Empirical evidence for perspectival similarity.

Empirical evidence for perspectival similarity.
复制标题

视角相似性的经验证据。

DOI:
10.1037/rev0000403
复制
发表时间:
2023
影响因子:
5.4
通讯作者:
Firestone, Chaz
Firestone, Chaz
中科院分区:
心理学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Morales, Jorge;Firestone, Chaz

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

当一个圆形的硬币被旋转的深度,有没有任何意义,它来类似于一个椭圆?虽然这个问题是在一个丰富的和分裂的哲学传统的中心(与一些学者回答肯定和否定),莫拉莱斯等人。(2020,2021)采取了实证方法,报告了10个实验,其结果有利于这种透视相似性。最近,Burge和Burge(2022)对这项工作提出了有力的批评,从哲学和经验的角度反对它的方法和结论。在这里,我们从两个方面回答这些反对意见。我们表明,伯奇和伯奇的批评是基于对莫拉莱斯等人的误解。的索赔;之间的关系的数据和结论;和哲学的背景下,工作出现。具体来说,Burge和Burge认为我们有一个比我们所持有的更强(也更奇怪)的观点,涉及到“一个新的实体”的引入,它位于“远端形状和视网膜图像之间的某个中间位置”。我们并不持这种看法。事实上,一旦正确理解,Burge和Burge的大多数反对意见都支持Morales等人。而不是反对他们。最后,我们讨论了几个仍然没有答案的问题,并反映了一个富有成效的道路上前进的基础科学和哲学的兴趣这些问题。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2024阿帕,保留所有权利)
When a circular coin is rotated in depth, is there any sense in which it comes to resemble an ellipse? While this question is at the center of a rich and divided philosophical tradition (with some scholars answering affirmatively and some negatively), Morales et al.(2020, 2021) took an empirical approach, reporting 10 experiments whose results favor such perspectival similarity. Recently, Burge and Burge (2022) offered a vigorous critique of this work, objecting to its approach and conclusions on both philosophical and empirical grounds. Here, we answer these objections on both fronts. We show that Burge and Burge’s critique rests on misunderstandings of Morales et al.’s claims; of the relation between the data and conclusions; and of the philosophical context in which the work appears. Specifically, Burge and Burge attribute to us a much stronger (and stranger) view than we hold, involving the introduction of “a new entity” located “in some intermediate position (s) between the distal shape and the retinal image.” We do not hold this view. Indeed, once properly understood, most of Burge and Burge’s objections favor Morales et al.’s claims rather than oppose them. Finally, we discuss several questions that remain unanswered, and reflect on a productive path forward on these issues of foundational scientific and philosophical interest.(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)
形状、视角以及感知到的和不感知到的东西:对 Morales、Bax 和 Firestone 的评论 (2020)。
DOI: 10.1037/rev0000363
发表时间: 2023
影响因子: 5.4
作者:
Burge,Johannes;Burge,Tyler
通讯作者: Burge,Tyler
DOI: 10.1111/nous.12384
发表时间: 2021
期刊: Noûs
影响因子: --
作者:
E. J. Green
通讯作者: E. J. Green
通过知觉认知差异解释冲突的形状知觉
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2024195118
发表时间: 2021
期刊: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
影响因子: --
作者:
P. Linton
通讯作者: P. Linton
看形状:形状外观和形状恒常性
DOI: --
发表时间: 2012
影响因子: 3.4
作者:
D. J. Bennett
通讯作者: D. J. Bennett
事情看起来平淡吗
DOI: 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2006.tb00585.x
发表时间: 2006
影响因子: 1.5
作者:
Eric Schwitzgebel
通讯作者: Eric Schwitzgebel