Coaching in the wild: Identifying factors that lead to success.
Coaching in the wild: Identifying factors that lead to success.
复制标题
野外辅导：识别导致成功的因素。
DOI：
10.1037/cpb0000042
复制
发表时间：
2015
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
E. Salas
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Shirley Sonesh;Chris W. Coultas;Shannon L. Marlow;C. Lacerenza;Denise L. Reyes;E. Salas
尽管高管教练已被证明是有效的，但很少有研究项目试图了解教练和受教练者之间新兴关系的重要性。本文从教练和受教练者的角度探讨了影响教练结果的因素，并介绍了工作联盟和信息共享对受教练者目标实现和受教练者洞察结果的中介作用结果。作者在学术教练样本和高管领域样本中探讨了这些因素。结果表明，在学术样本中，受训者动机与受训者目标实现和受训者洞察力显着正相关，但在现场样本中则不然。此外，在学术样本中，工作联盟和信息共享在一定程度上调节了教练的心理意识和受教练者的洞察力之间的关系，但不是现场样本。另一个值得注意的结果是，教练目标的难度并不影响教练参与在目标实现方面的成功程度。讨论了这些发现对研究和实践的影响。（PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2022 APA，保留所有权利）
Although executive coaching has been shown to be effective, few research initiatives have attempted to understand the importance of the emergent relationship between a coach and coachee. This article explores the factors that influence coaching outcomes from both the coach and coachee’s perspective and presents the results of the mediating effect that working alliance and information sharing have on coachee goal attainment and coachee insight outcomes. The authors explored these factors in both an academic coachee sample as well as an executive field sample. Results showed that coachee motivation was significantly positively related with coachee goal attainment and coachee insight in an academic sample but not in a field sample. Moreover, working alliance and information sharing partially mediated the relationship between a coach’s psychological mindedness and coachee insight in an academic, but not field, sample. Another notable result was that the difficulty of the coaching goal did not impact how successful the coaching engagement was in terms of goal attainment. Implications of these findings for both research and practice are discussed.(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)
影响因子：
22.4
作者：
MCCLELLAND, GH;JUDD, CM
通讯作者：
JUDD, CM
影响因子：
7
作者：
Maxwell, Scott E.;Cole, David A.
通讯作者：
Cole, David A.