Proof Paradoxes and Normic Support: Socializing or Relativizing?
Proof Paradoxes and Normic Support: Socializing or Relativizing?
复制标题
证明悖论和规范支持：社交化还是相对化？
作者：
M. Bello
Smith (2018) argues that, unlike other forms of evidence, naked statistical evidence fails to satisfy normic support. This is his solution to the puzzles of statistical evidence in legal proof. This paper focuses on Smith’s claim that DNA evidence in cold-hit cases does not satisfy normic support. I argue that if this claim is correct, virtually no other form of evidence used at trial can satisfy normic support. This is troublesome. I discuss a few ways in which Smith can respond.
彩票判断：一项哲学和实验研究
影响因子：
1.4
作者：
Ebert P
通讯作者：
Ebert P
在概率和确定性之间：什么证明了信念的合理性
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2016
期刊：
--
影响因子：
--
作者：
M Smith
通讯作者：
M Smith