Linguistic competence: Theory and empiry
Linguistic competence: Theory and empiry
复制标题
语言能力：理论与经验
DOI：
10.1515/flin.41.3-4.223
复制
发表时间：
2007
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
C. Lehmann
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
C. Lehmann
语言能力有时被当作一个理想化的概念，它在某种程度上体现了一个理想的说话者和听话者的集体知识。然而，基本概念是个人的语言能力。如果所涉语言不是母语，则理所当然地认为该人可能在某种程度上精通该语言。然后，标准通常由本地能力设定。然而，本土能力本身就是一个程度问题。因此，需要有客观的标准，以便按照共同标准评估一个人在一种或多种语文方面的能力。这就需要有一个具有经验意义的语言能力概念。本文试图提出一个可以转化为语言测试的语言能力概念。在此基础上设计了一个测试，并对母语和非母语的德国人进行了测试。实验结果表明，无论是理论上还是实证上，母语能力和外语能力在原则上都没有区别。
Abstract Language competence has sometimes been used as an idealized notion which somehow embodies the collective knowledge of a speech community in the person of an ideal speaker-hearer. However, the basic notion is the competence of an individual in a language. If the language in question is not the native language, it is taken for granted that the person may be proficient in the language to some degree. The standard is then generally set by native competence. However, native competence is itself a matter of degree. Consequently, objective criteria are required by which one may assess the competence of a person in one or more languages by a common standard. This presupposes a notion of linguistic competence which has empirical import. The paper tries to articulate a concept of linguistic competence which can be converted into language tests. A test was devised on this basis and administered to groups of native and non-native speakers of German. The results of the experiment suggest that there is no difference in principle between native and foreign language competence, whether on theoretical or empirical grounds.
影响因子：
5.4
作者：
WHITE, RW
通讯作者：
WHITE, RW
DOI：
10.1016/s0022-5371(80)90312-6
发表时间：
1980-01-01
期刊：
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR
影响因子：
--
作者：
DANEMAN, M;CARPENTER, PA
通讯作者：
CARPENTER, PA