Student, Staff, and Faculty Perspectives on Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence on 3 Public University Campuses: Protocol for the UC Speaks Up Study and Preliminary Results.

Student, Staff, and Faculty Perspectives on Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence on 3 Public University Campuses: Protocol for the UC Speaks Up Study and Preliminary Results.
复制标题

DOI:
10.2196/31189
复制
发表时间:
2022-04-05
影响因子:
1.7
通讯作者:
Swendeman, Dallas
Swendeman, Dallas
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Wagman, Jennifer A.;Amabile, Claire;Sumstine, Stephanie;Park, Eunhee;Boyce, Sabrina;Silverman, Jay;Fielding-Miller, Rebecca;Oaks, Laury;Swendeman, Dallas

文献摘要

参考文献

相似文献

亲密伴侣和性暴力是美国学院和大学校园普遍存在的公共卫生问题。建议开展研究,为学生幸存者制定和维持有效、相关和可接受的预防计划和应对服务。加州大学 (UC) 的 Speaks Up 研究旨在调查导致加州大学 3 个校区的亲密伴侣暴力和性暴力的因素,并利用研究结果制定和测试预防暴力、促进健康的干预措施和政策,并为后续大规模定量研究奠定基础。加州大学洛杉矶分校、加州大学圣地亚哥分校和加州大学圣巴巴拉分校进行了一项混合方法研究。第一阶段(2017-2020)涉及资源审计;学生对性同意的看法的文化共识模型;与学生进行深度访谈(IDIs)和焦点小组讨论,以了解与经历以及暴力预防和应对相关的校园环境的看法; IDI 与教职员工和社区利益相关者一起调查影响学生生活和经历的机构和社区安排。第二阶段(2020 年至今)涉及 IDI 与学生幸存者一起评估校园和社区服务的使用和看法。定性内容分析用于使用主题分析方法生成出现的实质性代码和子主题。 2019 年 1 月,我们对本科生、研究生和专业学生进行了 149 次免费访谈和 214 次网络调查,以建立文化共识模型。 2019 年 2 月至 2019 年 6 月期间,与 86 名(48%)本科生、21 名(11.7%)名研究生和专业学生、34 名(19%)名工作人员、27 名(15.1%)名教职人员和 11 名(6.1%)社区利益相关者进行了 179 次 IDI,并进行了 35 次焦点小组讨论(27/35,77% 为本科生,8/35 名) 23% 为研究生和专业学生),共有 201 名参与者参与。自 2020 年 9 月以来,计划的学生幸存者访谈已完成 50% (15/30)。这部分数据收集因 COVID-19 大流行而中断。招聘正在进行中。数据分析和第二阶段数据收集正在进行中。研究结果将用于制定和测试预防暴力、促进健康和福祉的干预措施,并确保幸存者服务与校园社区中的所有个人(包括那些通常没有得到充分研究的人)相关、可接受并满足他们的需求。研究结果还将用于为严格的加州大学系统范围内的公共卫生预防研究做准备。 DERR1-10.2196/31189
Intimate partner and sexual violence are pervasive public health issues on college and university campuses in the United States. Research is recommended for creating and maintaining effective, relevant, and acceptable prevention programs and response services for student survivors. The University of California (UC) Speaks Up study aims to examine factors contributing to intimate partner and sexual violence on 3 UC campuses and use the findings to develop and test interventions and policies to prevent violence, promote health, and lay the groundwork for subsequent large-scale quantitative research. A mixed methods study was conducted at UC Los Angeles, UC San Diego, and UC Santa Barbara. Phase I (2017-2020) involved a resource audit; cultural consensus modeling of students’ perceptions of sexual consent; in-depth interviews (IDIs) and focus group discussions with students to understand perceptions of campus environment related to experiences as well as prevention of and responses to violence; and IDIs with faculty, staff, and community stakeholders to investigate institutional and community arrangements influencing students’ lives and experiences. Phase II (2020-ongoing) involves IDIs with student survivors to assess the use and perceptions of campus and community services. Qualitative content analysis is used to generate substantive codes and subthemes that emerge, using a thematic analysis approach. In January 2019, we conducted 149 free-listing interviews and 214 web-based surveys with undergraduate and graduate and professional students for the cultural consensus modeling. Between February 2019 and June 2019, 179 IDIs were conducted with 86 (48%) undergraduate students, 21 (11.7%) graduate and professional students, 34 (19%) staff members, 27 (15.1%) faculty members, and 11 (6.1%) community stakeholders, and 35 focus group discussions (27/35, 77% with undergraduate students and 8/35, 23% with graduate and professional students) were conducted with 201 participants. Since September 2020, 50% (15/30) of the planned student survivor interviews have been conducted. This segment of data collection was disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Recruitment is ongoing. Data analysis and phase II data collection are ongoing. The findings will be used to develop and test interventions for preventing violence, promoting health and well-being, and ensuring that survivor services are relevant and acceptable to and meet the needs of all individuals in the campus community, including those who are typically understudied. The findings will also be used to prepare for rigorous, UC–system-wide public health prevention research. DERR1-10.2196/31189
DOI: 10.1177/0886260519840405
发表时间: 2021-08-01
影响因子: 2.5
作者:
Campe, Margaret I.
通讯作者: Campe, Margaret I.
DOI: 10.1177/0886260520958654
发表时间: 2020-09-20
影响因子: 2.5
作者:
Carmody, Mary D.;Cruz, Theresa H.;Handal, Alexis J.
通讯作者: Handal, Alexis J.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186471
发表时间: 2017-11-08
期刊: PLOS ONE
影响因子: 3.7
作者:
Mellins, Claude A.;Walsh, Kate;Hirsch, Jennifer S.
通讯作者: Hirsch, Jennifer S.
DOI: 10.1007/s12119-021-09841-w
发表时间: 2021
期刊: Sexuality & culture
影响因子: --
作者:
Bloom BE;Sorin CR;Wagman JA;Oaks L
通讯作者: Oaks L
DOI: 10.1177/1069397116680352
发表时间: 2017-02-01
影响因子: 2.5
作者:
Purzycki, Benjamin Grant;Jamieson-Lane, Alastair
通讯作者: Jamieson-Lane, Alastair