Of What Do We Testify? A Meditation on Becoming ‘Good’ and on the Nature of ‘Self’ in Self-Study

Of What Do We Testify? A Meditation on Becoming ‘Good’ and on the Nature of ‘Self’ in Self-Study
复制标题

我们见证什么?对“善”和自学中“自我”本质的沉思

DOI:
10.1080/17425964.2021.1951695
复制
发表时间:
2021
影响因子:
1.6
通讯作者:
R. Bullough
R. Bullough
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
R. Bullough

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

摘要自我概念在自学研究中往往被忽视,本文对自我和自学进行了调解。在G. H.米德的“我”和“我”的概念来定义自我,作者探讨了自我研究的本质和可能性,作为一个中心问题,“我证明什么?”这样的研究不仅是为了保证信念和行动之间的更大一致性,而且是为了道德上的主张,即更好的教育来自教育者的善良,他们必须成为年轻人值得信赖的向导。注意到真实性和一致性作为自我形成的动机的潜在危险,包括原教旨主义形式的兴起,作者建议真诚作为一种有前途的道德替代品,认真对待“善良”。
ABSTRACT Noting that the concept of ‘self’ often is given short shrift in self-study research, the author engages in a mediation on self and self-study. Drawing on G.H. Mead’s conception of the ‘I’ and the ‘Me’ to define the self, the author explores the nature of and possibilities for self-study that addresses as a central question, ‘Of what do I testify?’ Such research is justified not only by the promise of greater congruence between beliefs and actions, but by the moral claim that better education flows from the increased goodness of educators who must function as trustworthy guides of the young. Noting the potential dangers of authenticity and congruence as motives in self-formation, including the rise of forms of fundamentalism, the author suggests sincerity as a promising moral alterative for self-study that takes ‘goodness’ seriously.
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199291557.003.0008
发表时间: 2010-11
期刊: Freud and Religion
影响因子: --
作者:
Todd Dufresne;Gregory C. Richter
通讯作者: Todd Dufresne;Gregory C. Richter
DOI: --
发表时间: 2004
期刊: Koza Seimei Vol.7
影响因子: --
作者:
TANI;Toru
通讯作者: Toru