GoodReports: developing a website to help health researchers find and use reporting guidelines.
GoodReports: developing a website to help health researchers find and use reporting guidelines.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1186/s12874-021-01402-x
复制
发表时间：
2021-10-17
影响因子：
4
通讯作者：
Schlüssel M
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Struthers C;Harwood J;de Beyer JA;Dhiman P;Logullo P;Schlüssel M
赤道网络主要通过提高报告指南的认识和使用来提高健康研究的质量和透明度。 2018 年，英国 EQUATOR 中心推出了 GoodReports.org，这是一个帮助作者查找和使用报告指南的网站。本文介绍了该工具迄今为止的开发情况。我们描述了在期刊稿件提交流程内外使用 GoodReports.org 的用户体验和行为。我们打算利用我们的发现为该工具的未来开发和测试提供信息。我们进行了一项调查，收集有关 GoodReports 网站用户体验的数据。我们交叉检查了提交给合作期刊的 100 份手稿的随机样本，以描述该工具的清单建议与我们的建议之间的一致性程度。我们比较了接触或未接触 GoodReports 工具的组之间提交完整的报告清单及其手稿的作者比例。我们还进行了一项研究，比较作者收到 GoodReports.org 的报告指南建议之前手稿文本报告的完整性与随后提交给合作期刊的文本的完整性。 70% (423/599) 的受访者将 GoodReports 的实用性评为 8 分或更高（满分 10 分），74% (198/267) 表示他们在使用该网站后对稿件进行了更改。在 84% (72/86) 的案例中，我们同意 GoodReports 报告指南的建议。在完成指南查找问卷的作者中，14% (10/69) 未能提交完整的清单，而未使用该工具的作者为 30% (41/136)。在收到 GoodReports 报告指南推荐的 69 名作者中，有 20 对稿件在使用 GoodReports 之前和之后可以接受审阅。在接触 GoodReports 后，五人在其方法部分中包含了更多信息。平均而言，作者在 GoodReports.org 上完成检查表之前报告了 57% 的必要报告项目，之后报告了 60%。数据表明，在撰写过程的早期而不是提交阶段需要报告指导。我们正在通过添加更多报告指南和创建可编辑的文章模板来开发 GoodReports。我们将在针对开始撰写健康研究文章的研究人员的随机试验中测试 GoodReports 用户是否可以撰写更完整的研究报告。在线版本包含可在 10.1186/s12874-021-01402-x 获取的补充材料。
Th EQUATOR Network improves the quality and transparency in health research, primarily by promoting awareness and use of reporting guidelines. In 2018, the UK EQUATOR Centre launched GoodReports.org, a website that helps authors find and use reporting guidelines. This paper describes the tool’s development so far. We describe user experience and behaviour of using GoodReports.org both inside and outside a journal manuscript submission process. We intend to use our findings to inform future development and testing of the tool. We conducted a survey to collect data on user experience of the GoodReports website. We cross-checked a random sample of 100 manuscripts submitted to a partner journal to describe the level of agreement between the tool’s checklist recommendation and what we would have recommended. We compared the proportion of authors submitting a completed reporting checklist alongside their manuscripts between groups exposed or not exposed to the GoodReports tool. We also conducted a study comparing completeness of reporting of manuscript text before an author received a reporting guideline recommendation from GoodReports.org with the completeness of the text subsequently submitted to a partner journal. Seventy percent (423/599) of survey respondents rated GoodReports 8 or more out of 10 for usefulness, and 74% (198/267) said they had made changes to their manuscript after using the website. We agreed with the GoodReports reporting guideline recommendation in 84% (72/86) of cases. Of authors who completed the guideline finder questionnaire, 14% (10/69) failed to submit a completed checklist compared to 30% (41/136) who did not use the tool. Of the 69 authors who received a GoodReports reporting guideline recommendation, 20 manuscript pairs could be reviewed before and after use of GoodReports. Five included more information in their methods section after exposure to GoodReports. On average, authors reported 57% of necessary reporting items before completing a checklist on GoodReports.org and 60% after. The data suggest that reporting guidance is needed early in the writing process, not at submission stage. We are developing GoodReports by adding more reporting guidelines and by creating editable article templates. We will test whether GoodReports users write more complete study reports in a randomised trial targeting researchers starting to write health research articles. The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12874-021-01402-x.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
15.8
作者：
Moher D;Liberati A;Tetzlaff J;Altman DG;PRISMA Group
通讯作者：
PRISMA Group
增强流行病学观察研究的报告（Strobe）陈述：报告观察性研究的指南。
影响因子：
15.8
作者：
通讯作者：
--
影响因子：
3.3
作者：
Jin Y;Sanger N;Shams I;Luo C;Shahid H;Li G;Bhatt M;Zielinski L;Bantoto B;Wang M;Abbade LP;Nwosu I;Leenus A;Mbuagbaw L;Maaz M;Chang Y;Sun G;Levine MA;Adachi JD;Thabane L;Samaan Z
通讯作者：
Samaan Z
影响因子：
6.1
作者：
Botos J
通讯作者：
Botos J
影响因子：
39.2
作者：
Collins, Gary S.;Reitsma, Johannes B.;Moons, Karel G. M.
通讯作者：
Moons, Karel G. M.