Public preferences for five electricity grid decarbonization policies in California

Public preferences for five electricity grid decarbonization policies in California
复制标题

公众对加州五项电网脱碳政策的偏好

DOI:
10.1111/ropr.12442
复制
发表时间:
2021
影响因子:
2.1
通讯作者:
Flora, June
Flora, June
中科院分区:
法学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Boudet, Hilary;Zanocco, Chad;Stelmach, Greg;Muttaqee, Mahmood;Flora, June

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

气候危机和与之相关的分布式、可再生能源发电的推动,迫使政策发生变化,以实现电网的脱碳和现代化。其中一些变化--例如,智能电表的推出和太阳能电池板采用的税收抵免--受到了媒体和社会科学家的关注,以了解公众的看法和反应。其他方面--例如,允许个人对个人的电力销售,促进住宅电气化,要求新开发的太阳能电池板,为微电网提供资金,以及向客户支付允许公用事业控制电力使用的费用--得到的关注较少。在这里,我们探索公众对加州居民(n=1804)对这些未被研究的政策的看法,加州是一个公认的创新能源政策的州。大多数受访者只支持其中一项政策-要求新开发太阳能电池板。其他人则引发了更多的犹豫不决;几乎没有人强烈反对。总体而言,男性受访者和拥有大学学位的人更支持此类政策,那些更关注气候变化、对智能家居技术更加开放的人也是如此。
The climate crisis and associated push for distributed, renewable electricity generation necessitate policy changes to decarbonize and modernize the electricity grid. Some of these changes—e.g., smart meter rollouts and tax credits for solar panel adoption—have received attention in the media and from social scientists to understand public perceptions and responses. Others—e.g., allowing peer‐to‐peer electricity sales, promoting residential electrification, requiring solar panels on new development, funding microgrids, and paying customers to allow for utility control of electricity use—have received less attention. Here, we explore public perceptions of these understudied policies among California residents (n= 804), a state recognized for innovative energy policy. A majority of respondents supported only one of the policies—requiring solar panels on new development. Others elicited more indecision; few were strongly opposed. In general, male respondents and those with college degrees were more supportive of such policies, as were those more concerned about climate change and with a more open orientation to smart home technologies.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2007.00467.x
发表时间: 2007
影响因子: 1.9
作者:
Chenyang Xiao;R. Dunlap
通讯作者: R. Dunlap
国家气候变化政策和可再生能源组合标准的采用
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2008.00360.x
发表时间: 2008
影响因子: 2.1
作者:
Daniel C. Matisoff
通讯作者: Daniel C. Matisoff
电网边缘的竞争:电力行业的创新和反垄断法
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2765502
发表时间: 2016
期刊: SRPN: Energy Politics (Topic)
影响因子: --
作者:
M. Wara
通讯作者: M. Wara
当气候变化适应成为社会“迫在眉睫的威胁”时:探索对加州野火和公共安全断电的看法和应对措施
DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101757
发表时间: 2020
影响因子: 6.7
作者:
G. Wong‐Parodi
通讯作者: G. Wong‐Parodi
探索高峰需求期间的家庭能源规则和活动,以更好地确定对分时定价的潜在响应
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111608
发表时间: 2020
期刊: Energy Policy
影响因子: 9
作者:
Stelmach, Greg;Zanocco, Chad;Flora, June;Rajagopal, Ram;Boudet, Hilary S.
通讯作者: Boudet, Hilary S.