The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study.
The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8
复制
发表时间：
2010-05
影响因子：
3.5
通讯作者：
de Vet, Henrica C. W.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Mokkink, Lidwine B.;Terwee, Caroline B.;Patrick, Donald L.;Alonso, Jordi;Stratford, Paul W.;Knol, Dirk L.;Bouter, Lex M.;de Vet, Henrica C. W.
COSMIN研究的目的（基于常识的健康状况测量仪器选择标准）是开发一个基于共识的检查表，以评估测量特性研究的方法学质量。我们提交了COSMIN清单以及专家组对清单项目的同意。与国际专家（心理学家、流行病学家、统计学家和临床医生）进行了四轮德尔菲研究。在91名受邀专家中，57名同意参加（63%）。小组成员被要求以五分制对他们对每项提案的（不）同意进行评分。当至少67%的小组成员表示“同意”或“强烈同意”时，就认为达成了共识。达成了共识，包括以下测量属性：内部一致性，可靠性，测量误差，内容效度（包括表面效度），结构效度（包括结构效度，假设检验和跨文化效度），标准效度，反应性和可解释性。后者不被视为一种测量属性。专家组还就如何评估这些特性达成了共识。由此产生的COSMIN清单可能是有用的，当选择一个测量工具，同行评审的手稿，设计或报告的测量性能的研究，或用于教育目的。
Aim of the COSMIN study (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments) was to develop a consensus-based checklist to evaluate the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties. We present the COSMIN checklist and the agreement of the panel on the items of the checklist. A four-round Delphi study was performed with international experts (psychologists, epidemiologists, statisticians and clinicians). Of the 91 invited experts, 57 agreed to participate (63%). Panel members were asked to rate their (dis)agreement with each proposal on a five-point scale. Consensus was considered to be reached when at least 67% of the panel members indicated ‘agree’ or ‘strongly agree’. Consensus was reached on the inclusion of the following measurement properties: internal consistency, reliability, measurement error, content validity (including face validity), construct validity (including structural validity, hypotheses testing and cross-cultural validity), criterion validity, responsiveness, and interpretability. The latter was not considered a measurement property. The panel also reached consensus on how these properties should be assessed. The resulting COSMIN checklist could be useful when selecting a measurement instrument, peer-reviewing a manuscript, designing or reporting a study on measurement properties, or for educational purposes.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
4
作者：
Mokkink, L B;Terwee, C B;de Vet, H C W
通讯作者：
de Vet, H C W
影响因子：
7.2
作者：
Terwee, Caroline B.;Bot, Sandra D. M.;de Vet, Henrica C. W.
通讯作者：
de Vet, Henrica C. W.
影响因子：
10.5
作者：
Marshall, M;Lockwood, A;Fenton, M
通讯作者：
Fenton, M
影响因子：
3.8
作者：
Powell, C
通讯作者：
Powell, C
影响因子：
7.2
作者：
de Vet, Henrica C. W.;Terwee, Caroline B.;Bouter, Lex M.
通讯作者：
Bouter, Lex M.