A meta-analysis of event-related potential correlates of recognition memory.

A meta-analysis of event-related potential correlates of recognition memory.
复制标题

DOI:
10.3758/s13423-023-02309-y
复制
发表时间:
2023-12
影响因子:
3.5
通讯作者:
Morcom AM
Morcom AM
中科院分区:
心理学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Kwon S;Rugg MD;Wiegand R;Curran T;Morcom AM

文献摘要

参考文献

相似文献

A longstanding question in memory research is whether recognition is supported by more than one mnemonic process. Dual-process models distinguish recollection of episodic detail from familiarity, while single-process models explain recognition in terms of one process that varies in strength. Dual process models have drawn support from findings that recollection and familiarity elicit distinct electroencephalographic event-related potentials (ERPs): a mid-frontal ERP effect that occurs at around 300–500 ms post-stimulus onset and is often larger for familiarity than recollection contrasts, and a parietal ERP effect that occurs at around 500–800 ms and is larger for recollection than familiarity contrasts. We sought to adjudicate between dual- and single-process models by investigating whether the dissociation between these two ERP effects is reliable over studies. We extracted effect sizes from 41 experiments that had used Remember-Know, source memory, and associative memory paradigms (1,000 participants). Meta-analysis revealed a strong interaction between ERP effect and mnemonic process of the form predicted by dual-process models. Although neither ERP effect was significantly process-selective taken alone, a moderator analysis revealed a larger mid-frontal effect for familiarity than recollection contrasts in studies using the Remember-Know paradigm. Mega-analysis of raw data from six studies further showed significant process-selectivity for both mid-frontal and parietal ERPs in the predicted time windows. On balance, the findings favor dual- over single-process theories of recognition memory, but point to a need to promote sharing of raw data. The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.3758/s13423-023-02309-y.
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.06.027
发表时间: 2012-09
期刊: Neuropsychologia
影响因子: 2.6
作者:
Mollison MV;Curran T
通讯作者: Curran T
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.10.030
发表时间: 2011-01-07
期刊: Brain research
影响因子: 2.9
作者:
Diana RA;Van den Boom W;Yonelinas AP;Ranganath C
通讯作者: Ranganath C
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.031
发表时间: 2012-08-01
期刊: NEUROIMAGE
影响因子: 5.7
作者:
Addante, Richard J.;Ranganath, Charan;Yonelinas, Andrew P.
通讯作者: Yonelinas, Andrew P.
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.100
发表时间: 2010-04-01
期刊: NEUROIMAGE
影响因子: 5.7
作者:
Bader, Regine;Mecklinger, Axel;Meyer, Patric
通讯作者: Meyer, Patric
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116054
发表时间: 2020-02-15
期刊: NEUROIMAGE
影响因子: 5.7
作者:
Bigdely-Shamlo, Nima;Touryan, Jonathan;Robbins, Kay
通讯作者: Robbins, Kay