Five questions to consider when conducting COVID-19 phone research.
Five questions to consider when conducting COVID-19 phone research.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004917
复制
发表时间:
2021-07
影响因子:
8.1
通讯作者:
Totapally S
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Menon S;Sonderegger P;Totapally S
As with all research, additionality is important for phone surveys; calling people during a pandemic raises that bar significantly. In India alone, an estimated 1300+ primary research studies 1 have been published since the pandemic began. Additionality becomes more important given this scale of data generation. Some tools that helped us clarify additionality include COVID-19-related survey archives (WHO, Azim Premji, Emerge), as well as collaboratives like CORE Net that allow organisations to coordinate research questions and share findings. For example, for their forthcoming studies on gender and health, respectively, Dalberg and IDInsight included identical questions on food security to enable comparisons across time and subpopulations. Consider non-traditional additionalities. Studies that replicate a research question can still add value (eg, amplifying sample size, new demographic cuts). Qualitative interviews, although not generalisable, can nuance existing findings.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
Greenleaf, Abigail R.;Gadiaga, Aliou;Moreau, Caroline
通讯作者:
Moreau, Caroline
DOI:
10.21037/mhealth.2019.07.05
发表时间:
2019-01-01
期刊:
mHealth
影响因子:
--
作者:
Mwaka, Erisa;Nakigudde, Janet;Pariyo, George
通讯作者:
Pariyo, George
影响因子:
3.3
作者:
Heidkamp, Rebecca;Hazel, Elizabeth;Bryce, Jennifer
通讯作者:
Bryce, Jennifer
影响因子:
8.1
作者:
Angrist, Noam;Bergman, Peter;Letsomo, Thato
通讯作者:
Letsomo, Thato
影响因子:
4
作者:
Lee,K. S. Kylie;Fitts,Michelle S.;Conigrave,Katherine M.
通讯作者:
Conigrave,Katherine M.