Contrasting frames in policy debates on climate change adaptation
Contrasting frames in policy debates on climate change adaptation
复制标题
气候变化适应政策辩论的对比框架
DOI：
10.1002/wcc.227
复制
发表时间：
2013
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Dewulf A
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Dewulf A
问题、决策或事件从不同角度获得不同意义的过程被称为框架。在关于气候变化适应的政策辩论中，制定适应问题是一项挑战，可能对适应项目的形成和成功产生深远影响。从关于如何构建和辩论气候变化适应的意义的现有文献中，确定了框架差异的三个关键维度：(1)适应和减缓之间的紧张关系，这是关于气候变化的两种截然不同但相互关联的观点；(2)将气候变化适应视为一个温和的技术问题与将气候变化视为一个邪恶的治理问题之间的对比；(3)将气候变化适应作为安全问题的框架，将国家安全框架与人类安全框架进行对比。本文认为，通过将这些维度与框架研究中的以下主题更紧密地联系起来，可以丰富气候变化适应的框架研究：(1)决策偏差如何将框架问题视为结构化技术问题；(2)将问题置于特定尺度层次的尺度框架过程；(3)适应过程中处理各种框架的挑战。生物工程学报，2013,(4):391 - 391。doi: 10.1002 /“。[27]本文分类为：气候变化的认知、行为和传播；气候风险的社会放大/衰减；气候变化的脆弱性和适应；基于价值的脆弱性和适应方法
The process by which issues, decisions, or events acquire different meanings from different perspectives has been studied as framing. In policy debates about climate change adaptation, framing the adaptation issue is a challenge with potentially far‐reaching implications for the shape and success of adaptation projects. From the available literature on how the meaning of climate change adaptation is constructed and debated, three key dimensions of frame differences were identified: (1) the tension between adaptation and mitigation as two contrasting but interrelated perspectives on climate change; (2) the contrast between framing climate change adaptation as a tame technical problem, and framing climate change as a wicked problem of governance; and (3) the framing of climate change adaptation as a security issue, contrasting state security frames with human security frames. It is argued that the study of how climate change adaptation gets framed could be enriched by connecting these dimensions more closely with the following themes in framing research: (1) how decision‐making biases that to framing issues as structured technical problems; (2) the process of scale framing by which issues are situated at a particular scale level; and (3) the challenge of dealing with the variety of frames in adaptation processes.WIREs Clim Change2013, 4:321–330. doi: 10.1002/wcc.227This article is categorized under:Perceptions, Behavior, and Communication of Climate Change > Social Amplification/Attenuation of Climate RisksVulnerability and Adaptation to Climate Change > Values‐Based Approach to Vulnerability and Adaptation
登录
查看更多内容
了解欧洲多个治理层面的气候变化适应框架
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2011
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
S. Juhola;E. Keskitalo;Lisa Westerhoff
通讯作者：
Lisa Westerhoff
社会运动的比较视角：文化、意识形态和战略框架
影响因子：
5
作者：
M. Zald
通讯作者：
M. Zald
影响因子：
4.2
作者：
Boin, Arjen;'t Hart, Paul;McConnell, Allan
通讯作者：
McConnell, Allan
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2002
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
N. Phillips;C. Hardy
通讯作者：
C. Hardy
影响因子：
64.8
作者：
R. Pielke;G. Prins;S. Rayner;D. Sarewitz
通讯作者：
R. Pielke;G. Prins;S. Rayner;D. Sarewitz