The role of multiple SARS-CoV-2 viral antigens in a vaccine-induced integrated immune response.
The role of multiple SARS-CoV-2 viral antigens in a vaccine-induced integrated immune response.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.03.067
复制
发表时间:
2021-04-28
期刊:
影响因子:
5.5
通讯作者:
Li Q
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Zhang Y;Li D;Zhao H;Wang L;Liao Y;Li X;Mou T;Li Q
The global pandemic caused by the new coronavirus severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which emerged at the end of 2019, has led to a public health crisis in which more than 30 million people have been infected and 1 million have died [1, 2]. Accelerated vaccine and drug development in different countries and regions (accessed at ClinicalTrials. gov as of Oct. 10, 2020) resulted in the rapid entry of several different types of vaccines into clinical trials [3]. Shortly thereafter, a series of clinical data were obtained, especially immunogenic data [4–6]. These studies provide a basis for the development of effective vaccines, but at the same time, they have raised a series of questions regarding the mechanism underlying the immunological response to infection with SARS-CoV-2, the differences in immunogenicity among various types of vaccines and the different immune responses they induce [7]. Our understanding of SARS-CoV-2 is based solely on the limited studies on other members of the coronavirus family [7]. Therefore, the characteristics of the immune response to infection with SARS-CoV-2 should serve as the theoretical basis for the identification of a suitable vaccine antigen. SARS-CoV-2 contains four major structural proteins, namely, spike (S), membrane (M), envelope (E) and nucleocapsid (N). Among these four proteins, S is being used as the leading target antigen in vaccine development because it is responsible for recognition of the host cellular receptor to initiate virus entry. In contrast, N protein packages the viral RNA to form a helical capsid and is essential for virus viability. Although N proteins are highly immunogenic and are expressed abundantly during infection of many coronaviruses family members [8], their complicated role in inducing an immune response is unable to judge its significance as a major target antigen for vaccine. Studies of SARS-CoV and avian coronavirus infectious bronchitis virus showed that N antibodies are not neutralizing nor protecting [9–11]; however, N antibodies or N-specific T cell epitopes have also been reported to protect animals from infection by mouse hepatitis virus, IBV, SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV [12–15]. There are also reports showing that although the crystal structure of the SARS-CoV-2 N protein is similar to that of the SARS-CoV N protein, their surface electrostatic potential characteristics are distinct [16]. These findings might suggest a complicated role of N proteins in different coronavirus infections. With a microneutralization assay using SARS-CoV-2 live virus and an ELISA kit coated with recombinant S protein, N protein and native purified viral antigen, we were able to detect not only varied titers of neutralizing antibodies (1: 16–1: 256) but also high titers of anti-S, anti-N and anti-whole-virion antibodies (Fig. 1 ab). The presence of these antibodies in the convalescent sera of COVID-19 patients suggests the stimulation of the immune system by various antigen components of SARS-CoV-2 throughout the disease course. This raises the question of whether the antibodies against other viral antigens, especially the N protein as the major nucleocapsid protein, function in the antiviral immune response. The antiviral effect of the anti-N antibody was further observed in a rhesus monkey immunization challenge test using a specially prepared inactivated vaccine containing exposed structural protein components of SARS-CoV-2. In rhesus macaques immunized with two doses of 200, 100 and 20 EUs (ELISA units, the viral antigen concentration determined by ELISA) inactivated vaccine with a 14-day interval, the neutralizing antibody reaction showed a dose-dependent …
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
64.8
作者:
Li W;Moore MJ;Vasilieva N;Sui J;Wong SK;Berne MA;Somasundaran M;Sullivan JL;Luzuriaga K;Greenough TC;Choe H;Farzan M
通讯作者:
Farzan M
影响因子:
32.4
作者:
Zhao J;Zhao J;Mangalam AK;Channappanavar R;Fett C;Meyerholz DK;Agnihothram S;Baric RS;David CS;Perlman S
通讯作者:
Perlman S
影响因子:
12.7
作者:
Liao, Yun;Li, Xueqi;Li, Qihan
通讯作者:
Li, Qihan
影响因子:
4.4
作者:
Yasui, Fumihiko;Kai, Chieko;Kohara, Michinori
通讯作者:
Kohara, Michinori
影响因子:
1.6
作者:
Gupta P;Goyal K;Kanta P;Ghosh A;Singh MP
通讯作者:
Singh MP