Backward crosstalk effects in psychological refractory period paradigms: effects of second-task response types on first-task response latencies

Backward crosstalk effects in psychological refractory period paradigms: effects of second-task response types on first-task response latencies
复制标题

心理不应期范式中的后向串扰效应:第二任务响应类型对第一任务响应延迟的影响

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2006
期刊:
Psychological Research
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Jeff Miller
Jeff Miller
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Jeff Miller

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

使用心理不应期(PRP)任务的三个实验记录了后向串扰效应,其中第二任务响应的性质影响了第一任务响应延迟。这种效应在目前流行的瓶颈模型中很难解释,根据该模型,第二任务反应选择直到第一任务反应选择完成才开始。在实验1和2中,PRP任务的第一个需要选择反应时间(RT)的反应,而第二个任务需要去/不去的决定。当第二个任务需要进行响应时,任务1的响应速度要快于它需要不进行响应时。实验3表明,任务1反应时也受到第二任务反应复杂性的影响。这些后向串扰效应表明,显着的第二个任务的处理进行的时间,以影响第一个任务的反应,从而挑战严格的串行瓶颈模型。
Three experiments using psychological refractory period (PRP) tasks documented backward crosstalk effects in which the nature of the second-task response influenced the first-task response latencies. Such effects are difficult to explain within currently popular bottleneck models, according to which second-task response selection does not begin until first-task response selection has finished. In Experiments 1 and 2, the first of the PRP tasks required a choice reaction time (RT) response, whereas the second task required a go/no-go decision. Task 1 responses were faster when the second task required a go response than when it required a no-go response. Experiment 3 showed that Task 1 RTs were also influenced by the complexity of second-task responses. These backward crosstalk effects indicate that significant second-task processing is carried out in time to influence first-task responses and thus challenge strictly serial bottleneck models.
DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.97.2.253
发表时间: 1990-04-01
影响因子: 5.4
作者:
KORNBLUM, S;HASBROUCQ, T;OSMAN, A
通讯作者: OSMAN, A