Ventral tegmental area D2 receptor knockdown enhances choice impulsivity in a delay-discounting task in rats.
Ventral tegmental area D2 receptor knockdown enhances choice impulsivity in a delay-discounting task in rats.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.bbr.2017.12.029
复制
发表时间:
2018-04-02
影响因子:
2.7
通讯作者:
Bass CE
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Bernosky-Smith KA;Qiu YY;Feja M;Lee YB;Loughlin B;Li JX;Bass CE
Impulsivity associated with abnormal dopamine (DA) function has been observed in several disorders, including addiction. Choice impulsivity is the preference for small, immediate rewards over larger rewards after a delay, caused by excessive discounting of future rewards. Addicts have abnormally high discount rates and prefer the smaller rewards sooner. While impulsivity has been inversely correlated with DA D2 receptor (D2R) availability in the midbrain and striatum, it is difficult to mechanistically link the two, due to the diverse neuroanatomical localization of D2Rs, which are found throughout the brain, in many types of neurons and neuronal subcompartments. To determine if ventral tegmental area (VTA) D2R hypofunction is linked to impulsivity, we knocked down D2 receptors from the VTA, using an adeno-associated viral (AAV) vector that delivers short hairpin RNAs (shRNA) targeted against the D2R. The D2R knockdown is restricted to neurons whose cell bodies reside in the VTA, leaving postsynaptic D2Rs intact in the striatum, prefrontal cortex, and other mesocorticolimbic structures. Rats were trained in a delay-discounting task to assess impulsive choice until a stable discounting curve was obtained, and then received bilateral VTA infusions of the D2R shRNA or a scrambled control virus. Over the next six weeks, the discounting curve of the VTA D2R knockdown rats shifted to the left, indicating a preference for the smaller, immediate reward, whereas the curve for control rats remained stable and unchanged. Together these results demonstrate that a decrease in VTA D2 receptors enhances choice impulsivity.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
12.4
作者:
Cearley, CN;Wolfe, JH
通讯作者:
Wolfe, JH
DOI:
10.1016/j.cub.2016.11.029
发表时间:
2017-01-09
期刊:
Current biology : CB
影响因子:
--
作者:
Kim YC;Han SW;Alberico SL;Ruggiero RN;De Corte B;Chen KH;Narayanan NS
通讯作者:
Narayanan NS
影响因子:
3
作者:
Bass CE;Grinevich VP;Gioia D;Day-Brown JD;Bonin KD;Stuber GD;Weiner JL;Budygin EA
通讯作者:
Budygin EA
影响因子:
6.8
作者:
Joutsa J;Voon V;Johansson J;Niemelä S;Bergman J;Kaasinen V
通讯作者:
Kaasinen V
影响因子:
5.2
作者:
Jentsch JD;Ashenhurst JR;Cervantes MC;Groman SM;James AS;Pennington ZT
通讯作者:
Pennington ZT