Defining and Measuring Community Engagement and Community-Engaged Research: Clinical and Translational Science Institutional Practices.
Defining and Measuring Community Engagement and Community-Engaged Research: Clinical and Translational Science Institutional Practices.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1353/cpr.2018.0034
复制
发表时间：
2018
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Wallerstein N
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Eder MM;Evans E;Funes M;Hong H;Reuter K;Ahmed S;Calhoun K;Corbie-Smith G;Dave G;DeFino M;Harwood E;Kissack A;Kleinman LC;Wallerstein N
The institutions which comprise the Clinical and Translational Science Award consortium and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences continue to explore and develop community engaged research strategies and to study the role of community academic partnerships in advancing the science of community engagement. To explore Clinical and Translational Science institutions (CTSA) in relation to an Institute of Medicine recommendation that community engagement occur in all stages of translational research and be defined and evaluated consistently. A sequential multi-methods study starting with an online pilot survey followed by survey respondents and site informant interviews. A revised survey was sent to the community engagement and evaluation leads at each CTSA institution, requesting a single institutional response about definitions, indicators and metrics of community engagement and community-engaged research. A plurality of CTSA institutions selected the definition of community engagement from the Principles of Community Engagement. While claiming unique institutional priorities create barriers to developing shared metrics, responses indicate an overall lack of attention to the development and deployment of metrics to assess community engagement in and contributions to research. Although definitions of community engagement differ among CTSAs, there appears more similarities than differences in the indicators and measures tracked and reported on across all definitions, perhaps due to commonalities among program infrastructures and goals. Metrics will likely need to be specific to translational research stages. Assessment of community engagement within translational science will require increased institutional commitment.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.1097/acm.0b013e31829b54ae
发表时间：
2013-10
期刊：
Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges
影响因子：
--
作者：
Eder MM;Carter-Edwards L;Hurd TC;Rumala BB;Wallerstein N
通讯作者：
Wallerstein N
影响因子：
6.3
作者：
Baum, Fran;MacDougall, Colin;Smith, Danielle
通讯作者：
Smith, Danielle
DOI：
10.1177/1090198112459050
发表时间：
2013-06
期刊：
Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education
影响因子：
--
作者：
Khodyakov D;Stockdale S;Jones A;Mango J;Jones F;Lizaola E
通讯作者：
Lizaola E
影响因子：
6.6
作者：
Lasker, RD;Weiss, ES;Miller, R
通讯作者：
Miller, R
影响因子：
7.4
作者：
Aguilar-Gaxiola, Sergio;Ahmed, Syed;Wallerstein, Nina
通讯作者：
Wallerstein, Nina