On measuring community participation in research.
On measuring community participation in research.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/1090198112459050
复制
发表时间：
2013-06
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Lizaola E
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Khodyakov D;Stockdale S;Jones A;Mango J;Jones F;Lizaola E
社区合作伙伴积极参与社区-学术合作项目的研究方面通常被认为对此类项目的结果产生积极影响。然而，如果没有对社区参与研究活动水平的良好衡量，就无法从经验上确定社区参与研究的价值。根据我们最近对以行为健康问题为中心的社区学术合作项目的评估，本文使用半结构化访谈和调查数据概述了测量社区参与研究水平的两种互补方法——一种区分社区参与水平的“三模式”方法和一种提供社区参与研究过程多维视图的社区参与研究指数（CERI）。本文的主要目的是介绍和比较这些方法，讨论它们的优点和局限性，总结经验教训，并为未来的研究提供方向。我们发现，虽然三模型方法是衡量社区参与研究活动的一种简单方法，但CERI通过捕捉这种参与的多个方面，允许更细致入微的理解。虽然需要进一步的研究来验证这些措施，但我们的研究通过说明衡量社区参与研究的复杂性和三模型方法提供的简单分数缺乏可靠性做出了重大贡献。
Active participation of community partners in research aspects of community-academic partnered projects is often assumed to have a positive impact on the outcomes of such projects. The value of community engagement in research, however, cannot be empirically determined without good measures of the level of community participation in research activities. Based on our recent evaluation of community-academic partnered projects centered around behavioral health issues, this article uses semi-structured interview and survey data to outline two complementary approaches to measuring the level of community participation in research - a “three-model” approach that differentiates between the levels of community participation and a Community Engagement in Research Index (CERI) that offers a multidimensional view of community engagement in the research process. The primary goal of this article is to present and compare these approaches, discuss their strengths and limitations, summarize the lessons learned, and offer directions for future research. We find that while the three-model approach is a simple measure of the perception of community participation in research activities, CERI allows for a more nuanced understanding by capturing multiple aspects of such participation. Although additional research is needed to validate these measures, our study makes a significant contribution by illustrating the complexity of measuring community participation in research and the lack of reliability in simple scores offered by the three-model approach.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
6.3
作者：
Cook WK
通讯作者：
Cook WK
基于社区的参与性研究：从儿童环境健康和疾病预防研究中心汲取的教训。
影响因子：
10.4
作者：
Israel, Barbara A;Parker, Edith A;Rowe, Zachary;Salvatore, Alicia;Minkler, Meredith;Lopez, Jesus;Butz, Arlene;Mosley, Adrian;Coates, Lucretia;Lambert, George;Potito, Paul A;Brenner, Barbara;Rivera, Maribel;Romero, Harry;Thompson, Beti;Coronado, Gloria;Halstead, Sandy
通讯作者：
Halstead, Sandy
影响因子：
5.1
作者：
Khodyakov D;Stockdale S;Jones F;Ohito E;Jones A;Lizaola E;Mango J
通讯作者：
Mango J
影响因子：
8.2
作者：
Cunningham, WA;Preacher, KJ;Banaji, MR
通讯作者：
Banaji, MR
影响因子：
4.2
作者：
Minkler, Meredith;Vasquez, Victoria Breckwich;Petersen, Dana
通讯作者：
Petersen, Dana