Comparison of Oxidation Products from DNA Components by γ-Irradiation and Fenton-Type Reactions
Comparison of Oxidation Products from DNA Components by γ-Irradiation and Fenton-Type Reactions
复制标题
γ 辐射和 Fenton 型反应 DNA 成分氧化产物的比较
DOI:
10.1269/jrr.38.121
复制
发表时间:
1997
影响因子:
2
通讯作者:
H. Kasai
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
N. Murata‐Kamiya;H. Kamiya;M. Muraoka;H. Kaji;H. Kasai
The four 2'-deoxyribonucleosides were gamma-irradiated or were aerobically treated with Fenton-type-reagents, Fe(II)-EDTA or a renal carcinogen Fe(II)-nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA) under the neutral conditions. The reaction mixtures were immediately analyzed by reverse-phase HPLC. Major products detected were 2-hydroxydeoxyadenosine (2-OH-dA), 8,5'-cyclodeoxyadenosine (cyclo-dA), 8-hydroxydeoxyadenosine (8-OH-dA). 5-formyldeoxyuridine (5-CHO-dU), 5-hydroxydeoxycytidine (5-OH-dC), 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine (8-OH-dG), 8,5'-cyclodeoxyguanosine (cyclo-dG), and glyoxal and its adduct with dG. Ratio of these oxidized products were dramatically changed depending upon the agents used. For example, 2-OH-dA was a modified nucleoside produced most efficiently by Fe(II)-EDTA, while 5-CHO-dU and 5-OH-dC were the major products by the Fe(II)-NTA treatment and gamma-irradiation, respectively. Glyoxal itself was estimated to be produced most frequently (13 folds of 8-OH-dG) when treated with Fe(II)-EDTA, but its formation was not detected by the treatment with Fe(II)-NTA or by gamma-irradiation. 8-OH-dA was not produced by Fe-EDTA or Fe-NTA but was produced by gamma-irradiation. In contrast, 2-OH-dA was not produced by gamma-irradiation. These results suggest that triphosphates of 2-OH-dA, cyclo-dA, 8-OH-dA, cyclo-dG, 5-CHO-dU, 5-OH-dC, and glyoxal-dG as well as 8-OH-dG may be produced in cells with different ratio by various types of oxidative stress and involved in mutagenesis and carcinogenesis.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
56.9
作者:
AMES, BN
通讯作者:
AMES, BN
DOI:
10.1073/pnas.90.3.1122
发表时间:
1993-02-01
影响因子:
11.1
作者:
MORIYA, M
通讯作者:
MORIYA, M
DOI:
10.1073/pnas.91.14.6609
发表时间:
1994-07-05
影响因子:
11.1
作者:
FEIG, DI;SOWERS, LC;LOEB, LA
通讯作者:
LOEB, LA
影响因子:
14.9
作者:
PURMAL, AA;KOW, YW;WALLACE, SS
通讯作者:
WALLACE, SS
影响因子:
2.9
作者:
WOOD, ML;DIZDAROGLU, M;ESSIGMANN, JM
通讯作者:
ESSIGMANN, JM