Quantifying and mapping resilience within large organizations
Quantifying and mapping resilience within large organizations
复制标题
量化和映射大型组织内的弹性
DOI：
10.1016/j.omega.2018.08.012
复制
发表时间：
2019
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
I. Linkov
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Matthew D. Wood;Emily M. Wells;Glenn Rice;I. Linkov
为了补充风险评估，大型组织需要具有弹性，以便在面临不确定的未来威胁（无论威胁是环境、网络、安全相关的还是社会等）时保持关键功能。鉴于大型组织和未来威胁空间的复杂性，制定确保整个组织的弹性的计划和协议具有挑战性。我们建议大型组织可以将当前的组织弹性跨威胁事件周期阶段（计划，吸收，恢复，适应）和特定于上下文的弹性域（物理，信息，认知和社会）映射到上下文化的弹性指标。然后，可以通过仪表板或量化指数将各子构成部分相互比较，以便通过在其相关任务和能力的背景下确定各子构成部分的组织优势、弱点、协同作用和冗余，促进关于复原力的决策。美国陆军部是一个案例研究的例子，说明如何将大型复杂组织的弹性方法可视化，以使用这种方法来实现弹性见解。
To complement risk assessment, large organizations need to be resilient in order to maintain critical functioning in the face of uncertain future threats (whether the threat is environmental, cyber, security-related, social, etc.). Given the complexity of both large organizations and future threat space, it is challenging to enact programs and protocols that ensure resilience across whole organizations. We propose that large organizations can map current organizational resilience across threat event cycle phases (Plan, Absorb, Recover, Adapt) and context-specific resilience domains (Physical, Information, Cognitive, and Social) to contextualized resilience metrics. Subcomponents then can be compared to one another through dashboards or quantitative indices to facilitate decision making for resilience through identifying organizational strengths, weakness, synergies, and redundancies across its subcomponents in the context of their associated missions and capabilities. The United States Department of the Army is used as a case study example of how resilience approaches of large, complex organizations can be visualized to enable resilience insights using this methodology.
影响因子：
13.6
作者：
Ganin AA;Kitsak M;Marchese D;Keisler JM;Seager T;Linkov I
通讯作者：
Linkov I