Enhanced immune responses following heterologous vaccination with self-amplifying RNA and mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.
Enhanced immune responses following heterologous vaccination with self-amplifying RNA and mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1371/journal.ppat.1010885
复制
发表时间:
2022-10
期刊:
影响因子:
6.7
通讯作者:
Shattock, Robin J.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Elliott, Tamara;Cheeseman, Hannah M.;Evans, Abbey B.;Day, Suzanne;McFarlane, Leon R.;O'Hara, Jessica;Kalyan, Mohini;Amini, Fahimah;Cole, Tom;Winston, Alan;Fidler, Sarah;Pollock, Katrina M.;Harker, James A.;Shattock, Robin J.
The optimal vaccination strategy to boost responses in the context of pre-existing immune memory to the SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) glycoprotein is an important question for global public health. To address this, we explored the SARS-CoV-2-specific humoral and cellular immune responses to a novel self-amplifying RNA (saRNA) vaccine followed by a UK authorised mRNA vaccine (BNT162b2) in individuals with and without previous COVID-19, and compared these responses with those who received an authorised vaccine alone. 35 subjects receiving saRNA (saRNA group) as part of the COVAC1 clinical trial and an additional 40 participants receiving an authorised SARS-CoV-2 vaccine only (non-saRNA group) were recruited. Antibody responses were measured by ELISA and a pseudoneutralisation assay for wildtype, Delta and Omicron variants. Cellular responses were measured by IFN-ƴ ELISpot and an activation induced marker (AIM) assay. Approximately 50% in each group had previous COVID-19 prior to vaccination, confirmed by PCR or antibody positivity on ELISA. All of those who received saRNA subsequently received a full course of an authorised vaccine. The majority (83%) of those receiving saRNA who were COVID-19 naïve at baseline seroconverted following the second dose, and those with previous COVID-19 had an increase in antibody titres two weeks following saRNA vaccination (median 27-fold), however titres were lower when compared to mRNA vaccination. Two weeks following the 2nd authorised mRNA vaccine dose, binding and neutralising antibody titres were significantly higher in the saRNA participants with previous COVID-19, compared to non-saRNA, or COVID-19 naive saRNA participants. Cellular responses were again highest in this group, with a higher proportion of spike specific CD8+ than CD4+ T cells when compared to those receiving the mRNA vaccine only. These findings suggest an immunological benefit of increased antigen exposure, both from natural infection and vaccination, particularly evident in those receiving heterologous vaccination with saRNA and mRNA. With the continuing emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants of interest and of concern, there is an ever-growing population of people recovered from or immunised against COVID-19. The optimal vaccination strategies are still not established, but mounting evidence suggests enhanced protection from booster vaccination, and vaccination following natural infection (hybrid immunity). In this study we have compared immune responses in individuals who have received a novel self-amplifying RNA (saRNA) COVID-19 vaccine who have then subsequently received a UK authorised vaccine, and a group who received an authorised vaccine alone. Half the participants in each group had recovered from COVID-19. We found a superior immune response in those who had previous COVID-19 and received saRNA plus a UK authorised vaccine with regards to binding and neutralising antibody production, breadth of neutralisation against variants of concern (Delta and Omicron lineage variants) and T-cell responses. These findings suggest an immunological benefit of combining previous natural infection with vaccination against COVID-19 using a combination of different vaccine platforms.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
3.9
作者:
Nguyen THO;Cohen CA;Rowntree LC;Bull MB;Hachim A;Kedzierska K;Valkenburg SA
通讯作者:
Valkenburg SA
影响因子:
7.8
作者:
Buschmann MD;Carrasco MJ;Alishetty S;Paige M;Alameh MG;Weissman D
通讯作者:
Weissman D
DOI:
10.1056/nejmoa2035389
发表时间:
2021-02-04
期刊:
The New England journal of medicine
影响因子:
--
作者:
Baden LR;El Sahly HM;Essink B;Kotloff K;Frey S;Novak R;Diemert D;Spector SA;Rouphael N;Creech CB;McGettigan J;Khetan S;Segall N;Solis J;Brosz A;Fierro C;Schwartz H;Neuzil K;Corey L;Gilbert P;Janes H;Follmann D;Marovich M;Mascola J;Polakowski L;Ledgerwood J;Graham BS;Bennett H;Pajon R;Knightly C;Leav B;Deng W;Zhou H;Han S;Ivarsson M;Miller J;Zaks T;COVE Study Group
通讯作者:
COVE Study Group
影响因子:
24.8
作者:
Goel RR;Apostolidis SA;Painter MM;Mathew D;Pattekar A;Kuthuru O;Gouma S;Hicks P;Meng W;Rosenfeld AM;Dysinger S;Lundgreen KA;Kuri-Cervantes L;Adamski S;Hicks A;Korte S;Oldridge DA;Baxter AE;Giles JR;Weirick ME;McAllister CM;Dougherty J;Long S;D'Andrea K;Hamilton JT;Betts MR;Luning Prak ET;Bates P;Hensley SE;Greenplate AR;Wherry EJ
通讯作者:
Wherry EJ
影响因子:
7.7
作者:
Faulkner N;Ng KW;Wu MY;Harvey R;Margaritis M;Paraskevopoulou S;Houlihan C;Hussain S;Greco M;Bolland W;Warchal S;Heaney J;Rickman H;Spyer M;Frampton D;Byott M;de Oliveira T;Sigal A;Kjaer S;Swanton C;Gandhi S;Beale R;Gamblin SJ;McCauley JW;Daniels RS;Howell M;Bauer D;Nastouli E;Kassiotis G
通讯作者:
Kassiotis G